- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Things I suck at (the master list)

But why don't you understand guys?
Online rating is irrelevant to OTB strength.

But why don't you understand guys? Online rating is irrelevant to OTB strength.

@AnantKalia2006 said in #17:

@Prahadeesh1 "But we higher rated players". You are not high rated as well LMAO. High rated is 90th percentile on the time control you focus on.
Yes I know I am not a high rated player, I said that when comparing to @AnanyaMorzaria

@AnantKalia2006 said in #17: > @Prahadeesh1 "But we higher rated players". You are not high rated as well LMAO. High rated is 90th percentile on the time control you focus on. Yes I know I am not a high rated player, I said that when comparing to @AnanyaMorzaria

@Prince_of_6ixty4our said in #31:

But why don't you understand guys?
Online rating is irrelevant to OTB strength.

There is a strong correlation between the two. Definitely not a one-to-one correlation, but nevertheless they are closely tied together. For comparison, my USCF rating is 1700 and my online rapid rating is 2300. 1200-2400 is flatly ridiculous.

@Prince_of_6ixty4our said in #31: > But why don't you understand guys? > Online rating is irrelevant to OTB strength. There is a strong correlation between the two. Definitely not a one-to-one correlation, but nevertheless they are closely tied together. For comparison, my USCF rating is 1700 and my online rapid rating is 2300. 1200-2400 is flatly ridiculous.

@AustinL0926 you should be 1900 OTB uscf with your skills. Way higher then 1700

@AustinL0926 you should be 1900 OTB uscf with your skills. Way higher then 1700

@AustinL0926 said in #33:

There is a strong correlation between the two. Definitely not a one-to-one correlation, but nevertheless they are closely tied together. For comparison, my USCF rating is 1700 and my online rapid rating is 2300. 1200-2400 is flatly ridiculous.

Well, if there is a strong correlation between the two as you say, then I'm 1900 FIDE and my rapid rating is lower than yours in here.

@AustinL0926 said in #33: > There is a strong correlation between the two. Definitely not a one-to-one correlation, but nevertheless they are closely tied together. For comparison, my USCF rating is 1700 and my online rapid rating is 2300. 1200-2400 is flatly ridiculous. Well, if there is a strong correlation between the two as you say, then I'm 1900 FIDE and my rapid rating is lower than yours in here.

@VihaanDumir said in #35:

Um... I'm 2300+, 1263 FIDE.

You're 1958 Classical. Probably best not to use blitz or bullet numbers unless your FIDE rating achieved playing FIDE rated blitz or bullet games.

@VihaanDumir said in #35: > Um... I'm 2300+, 1263 FIDE. You're 1958 Classical. Probably best not to use blitz or bullet numbers unless your FIDE rating achieved playing FIDE rated blitz or bullet games.

I don't know what number we are at

I SUCK AT BLITZ

I don't know what number we are at I SUCK AT BLITZ

To all the once who said something about the rapid lichess rating and Fide has a strong correlation: Fide is classical, this is rapid. This is Glicko-2 rating, that s FIDE. Everybody has a different correlation, since these are two completely different ratings. For some, the ratings are same as in FIDE, for some there is a strong correlation, for some it is only 100 points and there are even people who have a rapid rating double than their FIDE.

To all the once who said something about the rapid lichess rating and Fide has a strong correlation: Fide is classical, this is rapid. This is Glicko-2 rating, that s FIDE. Everybody has a different correlation, since these are two completely different ratings. For some, the ratings are same as in FIDE, for some there is a strong correlation, for some it is only 100 points and there are even people who have a rapid rating double than their FIDE.

@AnantKalia2006 said in #39:

To all the once who said something about the rapid lichess rating and Fide has a strong correlation: Fide is classical, this is rapid. This is Glicko-2 rating, that s FIDE. Everybody has a different correlation, since these are two completely different ratings. For some, the ratings are same as in FIDE, for some there is a strong correlation, for some it is only 100 points and there are even people who have a rapid rating double than their FIDE.

Yes. I agree

@AnantKalia2006 said in #39: > To all the once who said something about the rapid lichess rating and Fide has a strong correlation: Fide is classical, this is rapid. This is Glicko-2 rating, that s FIDE. Everybody has a different correlation, since these are two completely different ratings. For some, the ratings are same as in FIDE, for some there is a strong correlation, for some it is only 100 points and there are even people who have a rapid rating double than their FIDE. Yes. I agree

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.