@biscuitfiend said in #80:
Sure, in the long run, pissing a few hundred people off for a few days probably doesn't matter. But when it happens again and again and again, it will start to matter eventually.
We all love Lichess here. We love what it provides, we love what it stands for, and has always stood for. But when the devs consistently make changes which are essentially experiments, it really doesn't feel like Lichess loves us back, regardless of whether the changes were made with good intentions.
we don't want to piss anyone off. and we do love our users. the reason that it sometimes feels like you're beta testers is because sometimes you are. lichess is free software and there's only one salaried employee on the website - thibault.
we could leave everything alone as some suggest and just let it ride, sure. on balance, i suspect we have a better shot at surviving if we allow contributors to try to make improvements. not all of them will land, and some (usually mine) will be massive clusterfuck abominations, but in general we think the arc bends towards improvement.
strident assertions that we need to test and/or communicate don't really help (although we agree). what could help us is volunteers who are willing to perform these tasks.
@biscuitfiend said in #80:
> Sure, in the long run, pissing a few hundred people off for a few days probably doesn't matter. But when it happens again and again and again, it will start to matter eventually.
>
> We all love Lichess here. We love what it provides, we love what it stands for, and has always stood for. But when the devs consistently make changes which are essentially experiments, it really doesn't feel like Lichess loves us back, regardless of whether the changes were made with good intentions.
we don't want to piss anyone off. and we do love our users. the reason that it sometimes feels like you're beta testers is because sometimes you are. lichess is free software and there's only one salaried employee on the website - thibault.
we could leave everything alone as some suggest and just let it ride, sure. on balance, i suspect we have a better shot at surviving if we allow contributors to try to make improvements. not all of them will land, and some (usually mine) will be massive clusterfuck abominations, but in general we think the arc bends towards improvement.
strident assertions that we need to test and/or communicate don't really help (although we agree). what could help us is volunteers who are willing to perform these tasks.