- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Can't create game with specific side any more

@Munich said in #780:

can you quote what you are referring to? sorry, I cant understand what you talk about, and if I can not understand it - how can other silent readers who just joined ? all I get is that you say it has no relevance to this thread. Maybe open a new one?

why always get black?: See my message #775

Stop your trolling garbage. Every time you seem to get caught out with a lie or when you get caught out stating flat out gibberish, you accuse the other of being a second account.

You did the same to me, and now again you are trolling with this relevance nonsense.

@Jseijp said in #728:

I am just wondering what your point with all this is. Is it that a fresh account should not know the rules? If someone is against cheating, are they wrong if they have a new account?

Have you also posted the account creation, games, and posts of other people on this thread, or are his stats of some special importance to you?

I am wondering about the reason behind you bringing this up like it means something, maybe I missed something

@Munich said in #732:

my point is that if you preach water, but secretly drink wine, you might question his intentions?

Its a lot to read, but if you read through his messages, beDecent gave indeed the impression he knows lichess for many years now. His account looks like that?

The white/black feature is missed, and there are solutions, and likely solutions I did not think off. The current solution was the simplest, but not necessarily the best: disabling the white/black option for casual AND ranked.
And it has nothing to do with playing 100% with white only gives improves your rating by about 22 rating points on the long run, because you can clearly see, it has been disabled for Casual, too. So the ranking wasnt the issue for disabling it.

Rather, it was the lack of consent when the automatching paired quickpairing players white-seekers.
The solution would be to not automatch white-seekers with players who went of the quickpairing page. Such white seekers appear in the lobby only.
Furthermore, if the number of games would swamp the lobby, then you could disable white/black for bullet time controls and blitz 3+0, as these time controls are by far the most played chosen time controls.

Anyway, better solutions exist, but I dont think beDecent lets it happen to seriously discuss them, but instead spams this thread, repeatedly referring to players (who have used the feature white/black) as "abusers". He does that on purpose, his way of trolling fun, isnt it?

Here are the posts that lead to you accusing me of being a second account for that guy. I want the exact reason behind your accusation and I want the proof to come along with it. Otherwise, you retract it and remove your disgusting post

@Munich said in #780: > can you quote what you are referring to? sorry, I cant understand what you talk about, and if I can not understand it - how can other silent readers who just joined ? all I get is that you say it has no relevance to this thread. Maybe open a new one? > > why always get black?: See my message #775 Stop your trolling garbage. Every time you seem to get caught out with a lie or when you get caught out stating flat out gibberish, you accuse the other of being a second account. You did the same to me, and now again you are trolling with this relevance nonsense. @Jseijp said in #728: > I am just wondering what your point with all this is. Is it that a fresh account should not know the rules? If someone is against cheating, are they wrong if they have a new account? > > Have you also posted the account creation, games, and posts of other people on this thread, or are his stats of some special importance to you? > > I am wondering about the reason behind you bringing this up like it means something, maybe I missed something @Munich said in #732: > my point is that if you preach water, but secretly drink wine, you might question his intentions? > > Its a lot to read, but if you read through his messages, beDecent gave indeed the impression he knows lichess for many years now. His account looks like that? > > The white/black feature is missed, and there are solutions, and likely solutions I did not think off. The current solution was the simplest, but not necessarily the best: disabling the white/black option for casual AND ranked. > And it has nothing to do with playing 100% with white only gives improves your rating by about 22 rating points on the long run, because you can clearly see, it has been disabled for Casual, too. So the ranking wasnt the issue for disabling it. > > Rather, it was the lack of consent when the automatching paired quickpairing players white-seekers. > The solution would be to not automatch white-seekers with players who went of the quickpairing page. Such white seekers appear in the lobby only. > Furthermore, if the number of games would swamp the lobby, then you could disable white/black for bullet time controls and blitz 3+0, as these time controls are by far the most played chosen time controls. > > Anyway, better solutions exist, but I dont think beDecent lets it happen to seriously discuss them, but instead spams this thread, repeatedly referring to players (who have used the feature white/black) as "abusers". He does that on purpose, his way of trolling fun, isnt it? Here are the posts that lead to you accusing me of being a second account for that guy. I want the exact reason behind your accusation and I want the proof to come along with it. Otherwise, you retract it and remove your disgusting post

I see no "lie" - can you quote the part you think is a lie? And where is the accusation you are talking about? Who is accused?

Why always get black? See my message #775

I see no "lie" - can you quote the part you think is a lie? And where is the accusation you are talking about? Who is accused? Why always get black? See my message #775

@Munich said in #740:

"I don't know it this message was for me, but I still don't see the relevance."

Are you beDecentForAChange? I wonder why you need to be explained the sky is blue.

Enough with the trolling. Stop this at once and remove these public accusations

@Munich said in #740: > "I don't know it this message was for me, but I still don't see the relevance." > > Are you beDecentForAChange? I wonder why you need to be explained the sky is blue. Enough with the trolling. Stop this at once and remove these public accusations

I still dont know what you are talking about. Cant you properly quote relevant text?

Why always get black? See my message #775

I still dont know what you are talking about. Cant you properly quote relevant text? Why always get black? See my message #775

@Munich said in #778:

well, you said you dont know it. (the first sentense is your sentence, not mine). The message was directed to bedecentforachange,

clearly a lie given the messages I quoted you on

@Munich said in #778: > well, you said you dont know it. (the first sentense is your sentence, not mine). The message was directed to bedecentforachange, clearly a lie given the messages I quoted you on

@Munich said in #784:

I still dont know what you are talking about. Cant you properly quote relevant text?

Why always get black? See my message #775
@Jseijp said in #783:
Enough with the trolling. Stop this at once and remove these public accusations

This

@Munich said in #784: > I still dont know what you are talking about. Cant you properly quote relevant text? > > Why always get black? See my message #775 @Jseijp said in #783: > Enough with the trolling. Stop this at once and remove these public accusations This

which lie? which sentence? you quoted this:

The white/black feature is missed, and there are solutions, and likely solutions I did not think off. The current solution was the simplest, but not necessarily the best: disabling the white/black option for casual AND ranked.
And it has nothing to do with playing 100% with white only gives improves your rating by about 22 rating points on the long run, because you can clearly see, it has been disabled for Casual, too. So the ranking wasnt the issue for disabling it."

which lie? which sentence? you quoted this: >The white/black feature is missed, and there are solutions, and likely solutions I did not think off. The current solution was the simplest, but not necessarily the best: disabling the white/black option for casual AND ranked. >And it has nothing to do with playing 100% with white only gives improves your rating by about 22 rating points on the long run, because you can clearly see, it has been disabled for Casual, too. So the ranking wasnt the issue for disabling it."

@Jseijp said in #786:

This

@Munich These acussations and lies

@Jseijp said in #786: > This @Munich These acussations and lies

sorry, nobody can understand what you talk. If you can not make yourself clear, I do what others do: dont understand and thus ignore.

other readers what to know:
Why always get black? See my message #775

sorry, nobody can understand what you talk. If you can not make yourself clear, I do what others do: dont understand and thus ignore. other readers what to know: Why always get black? See my message #775

Everybody understands what I'm talking about.

#728 I ask you for relevance

#732 you answer it

#740 you accuse me of being this other guy

#778 you lie about #723 being for him.

@Munich These acussations and lies

Give the prove that I'm the other account for Bedecent, or retract and remove your disgusting accusations

Everybody understands what I'm talking about. #728 I ask you for relevance #732 you answer it #740 you accuse me of being this other guy #778 you lie about #723 being for him. @Munich These acussations and lies Give the prove that I'm the other account for Bedecent, or retract and remove your disgusting accusations

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.