Can't create game with specific side any more

@Munich said in #770:

@ other readers.
just check gwendolino764, sort for black openings (that makes it easier) and look for Englund gambit. Then do the same for BeDecentForAChange.
1.d4 1...e5 - it is a very rare gambit, and it isnt in particular any good.

then look fout for this sicilian with ...e6

When you sort for white for both players, both do the italian, and there is a tendency by both players to play gambit lines.
I'd say this is like handwriting, pretty similar. it is maybe not as secure as a finger print, but if you invest more time, I am sure you find more similarities between Gwendolino764 and beDecentForAChange.
One thing in common is: both wrote in this thread.
ye out of 100.000 players you might find 2 or 3 with this opening repertoire, but both the same rating level, and both writing in this thread?? both with the expression "fixed it!"

These are not the only accounts that look very similar, but... I was asked to show one example, so I think the burden of proof is now with BeDecent, not me anymore. I found enough.

Edit: I want to point out, it could all be a coincidence. Having multiple accounts is against the fair terms of play with lichess: it would be abuse.

What about me? You accused me of the same. Play apply the same logic

dont play the clown, jseijp, you will know who you are. its the third time you ask who you are. Repeating a stale joke doesnt make it any better, but ye, you try to be funny, we got that. Maybe you are just a friend of BeDecentForAChange. its not important.

What I wanted to show is that GwhenDoLongDing and BeDecentForACheat play the same openings, have the same rating range, and use the same phrases.

@Munich said in #772:

dont play the clown, jseijp, you will know who you are. its the third time you ask who you are. Repeating a stale joke doesnt make it any better, but ye, you try to be funny, we got that. Maybe you are just a friend of BeDecentForAChange. its not important.

What I wanted to show is that GwhenDoLongDing and BeDecentForACheat play the same openings, have the same rating range, and use the same phrases.

It's not a joke kid, but your words are definitely clownesque. Everyone you disagree with gets accused of something on this thread. You're incredibly toxic in that regard and I won't let you spam over your baseless accussations like everyone else here seems to do.

I'm going to re-iterate your own words and ask again: You accused me of being another account for him with nothing to go by other than disagreeing with you. I'd like you to how me exactly how that is the case.

What the hell happened to this thread? I thought this was a thread to discuss the restriction on the ability to choose your color at the start of the game.

How did this turn into an accusatory pit of crap?

@Munich is calling everyone a cheater, @BeDecentForAChange is just making fun of him for not being all too good at making an argument.

Is anyone still actually using this thread to discuss the color change? Otherwise I ask that moderators close this, as the posts are no longer relevant

I am aware that a lot of players get now the same colour over and over again.
And the mods do not answer them why, but close their forums-thread (silence you) and redirect them to this thread.

The solution to your problem "getting served black all the time" is likely:
a) respawn with a fresh account, then at least you get 50/50 share of white.
b) or turn away from lichess in disgust and play at any other chess site.

However, here you do not get the answer.
All you get - you will be insulted as abuser. And in case you get angry and complain too harsh, maybe even using swear words - then you get banned. Which lichess should have done in the first place (that had not been fair, but at least honest and hostile), just that they didnt, but wanted you to play a lot of black games first. You wouldnt have played black 20 times or more if you had know that, right? It is kind of retaliation. You get abused "back". Sooner or later it dawns on you and you do either a) or b) or indeed play 1000 times or more as black in case you had 1000 games or more as white in the past.

@Munich said in #775:

I am aware that a lot of players get now the same colour over and over again.
And the mods do not answer them why, but close their forums-thread (silence you) and redirect them to this thread.

Here we go with the nonsense again. Mods are not silencing anyone. They are simply preventing people from opening up 100 threads with the same topic.

The solution to your problem "getting served black all the time" is likely:
a) respawn with a fresh account, then at least you get 50/50 share of white.
b) or turn away from lichess in disgust and play at any other chess site.

nobody gets black all the time. Over time, it evens out.

However, here you do not get the answer.
All you get - you will be insulted as abuser.

Or be called a cheater by you

And in case you get angry and complain too harsh, maybe even using swear words - then you get banned. Which lichess should have done in the first place, just that they didnt but wanted you to play a lot of black games first.

This is a new level of ridiculous. You are now saying that Lichess picks out players and forces them to play black in long streaks as retaliation for speaking out on a forum... What a delusion

You wouldnt have played black 20 times or more if you had know that, right?

This is not a sentence

It is kind of retaliation. You get abused "back".

Absolute garbage

Sooner or later it dawns on you and you do either a) or b) or indeed play 1000 times or more as black in case you had 1000 games or more as white in the past.

ridiculous statement

@Munich said in #740:

"I don't know it this message was for me, but I still don't see the relevance."

Are you beDecentForAChange? I wonder why you need to be explained the sky is blue.

I just want to keep this visible. I ask you again Munich. Please tell me which of your many points of comparison you have applied to conclude that we are the same person?

Or are you willing to retract and indeed admit that you were just ranting?

well, you said you dont know it. (the first sentense is your sentence, not mine). The message was directed to bedecentforachange, so I am asking, are you bedecent? because if not, the message was not for you. that was a rethoric question. you didnt get that? (and sorry, where is the rant in the part you quote?)

Edit: The way you react is as if you were indeed bedentofachange, but that was not the intention of my rethoric question, but rather that since you are not BeDecent, and thus you shall let him answer.
Or, you want me to think you are bedecentofachange. Anyway, dont spam this thread, others seem to get redirected here by mods, and they want to know the reason why they suddenly get 20 or more games in a row as black.

others: See my message #775

@Munich said in #778:

well, you said you dont know it. The message was directed to bedecentforachange, so I am asking, are you bedecent? because if not, the message was not for you. that was a rethoric question. you didnt get that? (and sorry, where is the rant in the part you quote?)

No, actually it was directed at me. You were answering me directly in that previous message where I asked what the point was, and you explained 'the point is...'. you did not speak to him, you referenced him in the exact context I asked you about. i appreciate that you're backpeddling on it though, it's not acceptable to throw out these accusations just because I question the relevance of some of your points

I then questioned the relevance, and you went on what seems to be one of your many public discrediting tours of immediately accusing me of being his second account.

The 'ranting' speaks to your constant accusations of course

can you quote what you are referring to? sorry, I cant understand what you talk about, and if I can not understand it - how can other silent readers who just joined ? all I get is that you say it has no relevance to this thread. Maybe open a new one?

why always get black?: See my message #775