Can't create game with specific side any more

Not BeDecentForAChange said:

There was a problem with abusive players, so they fixed it! :)

@BeDecentForAChange said in #660:

..., so they fixed it!

I dont know, some messages really read very similar in the style of BeDecentForAChange.

Not BeDecentForAChange said:

There was a problem with abusive players, so they fixed it! :)

@BeDecentForAChange said in #660:

..., so they fixed it!

I dont know, some messages really read very similar in the style of BeDecentForAChange.

You are aware that you are quoting me twice here?

and even though the same sentence above are from 2 different users, they play the same bad openings with comparable same rating.

All co-incidence, of course?

Really, if you look at there games (both have not played that many), you wonder if they arent the same player?

@gwendolino764
@BeDecentForAChange

Example:
both play 1.d4 e5 - the Englud gambit. Not really the most common opening?
both play the sicilian as black like this: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd5 e6 ... (ok, this is still a common sicilian, with ...e6, but what are the chances of both playing the same sicilian and the englud gambit?

Both players are rated around 1750 in Bullett?

With white both play the italian?

They both like playing gambits a lot?

ok, sure, sure, all coincidence. and the same style of sentences?

We dont know, I ask these questions, the other readers here can make up there mind and think if there if it could really be that BeDecent isnt only contributing 1/3 of all posts in this thread, but is it possible other accounts are him, too?

All formulated as questions by me, I am not saying this is the case. I just wonder about this co-incidence?

@Munich said in #754:

Really, if you look at there games (both have not played that many), you wonder if they arent the same player?

@gwendolino764
@BeDecentForAChange

Example:
both play 1.d4 e5 - the Englud gambit. Not really the most common opening?
both play the sicilian as black like this: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd5 e6 ... (ok, this is still a common sicilian, with ...e6, but what are the chances of both playing the same sicilian and the englud gambit?

Both players are rated around 1750 in Bullett?

With white both play the italian?

They both like playing gambits a lot?

ok, sure, sure, all coincidence. and the same style of sentences?

We dont know, I ask these questions, the other readers here can make up there mind and think if there if it could really be that BeDecent isnt only contributing 1/3 of all posts in this thread, but is it possible other accounts are him, too?

All formulated as questions by me, I am not saying this is the case. I just wonder about this co-incidence?

It is NOT

@Munich said in #754:

Really, if you look at there games (both have not played that many), you wonder if they arent the same player?

Yes. In fact, I'm actually the same holder of all new Lichess accounts.

@gwendolino764
@BeDecentForAChange

Example:
both play 1.d4 e5 - the Englud gambit. Not really the most common opening?
both play the sicilian as black like this: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd5 e6 ... (ok, this is still a common sicilian, with ...e6, but what are the chances of both playing the same sicilian and the englud gambit?

Both players are rated around 1750 in Bullett?

Did you not also find it very evident that I am a 1950, and did you no more than 2 hours ago propose the idea that I'm this other guy who is 2200?

With white both play the Italian?

Unheard of, playing the Italian is my thing, nobody else should be playing it

They both like playing gambits a lot?

ok, sure, sure, all coincidence. and the same style of sentences?

We dont know, I ask these questions, the other readers here can make up there mind and think if there if it could really be that BeDecent isnt only contributing 1/3 of all posts in this thread, but is it possible other accounts are him, too?

If that is the case, would that not even further invalidate your previous point about how the length of this post is actually relevant? In that case, the feature should remain deleted! Only I care, and I'm against having it re-instated!

All formulated as questions by me, I am not saying this is the case. I just wonder about this co-incidence?

To sum up your current delusions:

1. My account is new, therefore I must be the same account as other new ones.
2. I have the same rating as some players, so they must be the same
3. I am 200 points lower rated that some players: so I definitely must be the same as him, because I'm obviously his level
4. But also 2 and 3, since even though I am actually higher rated, I'm still the same as the other account
5. I'm also the 2200 level guy. I maintain all of these levels on different accounts.
6. Everybody who plays e4 e5 is my account

@Munich said in #754:

Both players are rated around 1750 in Bullett?

I can't begin to describe how funny it is that we're the same bullet rating

@Munich said in #754:

Really, if you look at there games (both have not played that many), you wonder if they arent the same player?

@gwendolino764
@BeDecentForAChange

Example:
both play 1.d4 e5 - the Englud gambit. Not really the most common opening?
both play the sicilian as black like this: 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd5 e6 ... (ok, this is still a common sicilian, with ...e6, but what are the chances of both playing the same sicilian and the englud gambit?

Both players are rated around 1750 in Bullett?

With white both play the italian?

They both like playing gambits a lot?

ok, sure, sure, all coincidence. and the same style of sentences?

We dont know, I ask these questions, the other readers here can make up there mind and think if there if it could really be that BeDecent isnt only contributing 1/3 of all posts in this thread, but is it possible other accounts are him, too?

All formulated as questions by me, I am not saying this is the case. I just wonder about this co-incidence?

Am I still in the mix? I have been here almost 10 years. I can't recall playing the Englund. I do play e4 and the Sicilian, and I'm partial to a gambit or a sac from time to time.

My ratings are slighyly different too

@BeDecentForAChange said in #756:

3. I am 200 points lower rated that some players: so I definitely must be the same as him, because I'm obviously his level

How do you know its a HIM ?

Facts are: these are co-incidences where the chances are very unlikely (but possible).

and who deleted now @gwendolino764 #403 contribution ?

Edit: Deleted part of the original message.

Got cha!