Can't create game with specific side any more

@AndrewWilis said in #759:

How do you know its a HIM ?

Because his name was a boxer. Same guess would go that you're a dude from your overall tone, punctuation, and you have a dude's name

@Munich said in #760:

Facts are: these are co-incidences where the chances are very unlikely (but possible).

All your 6 points, you try to muddle the waters, but both playing Englund gambit and the sicilian ...e6 variation and as white both italian players (not just 1.e4 e5 players).
Mathermatically, if these were truly independend openings, it would mean the sicilian ...e6 makes up 2% of all black opening variations, the italian is 4% of all white openings chosen, the Englund gambit as black is played 0.1% of all black openings.

They are not truly independent, but 0.02x0.04x0.001 = 0.00008% chance of another player playing this opening repertoire.

That's not actually how the math works though

Yes, there is a tendency that italian players maybe play more often the Englund gambit, etc.
But it is so strong correlated that you can change the assessment to something else than "very likely Gwendolino and BeDecent are the same player".

I'm confident I can whip up a list of at least 100 players on Lichess with your opening repetoire

1.e4 e5 is played in 11% of all games. This is because the very first move 1.e4 is about 50% of all white games, and the response 1...e5 is played in 20% of all games as a response to 1.e4, thus 50% x 22% = 11%. Of these 11% the lion share goes to the ruy lopez, etc. so indeed the italian is slightly less than 4% played of all games.

and why did you delete now @gwendolino764 #403 ?

If you scroll back to that section, you will see that he (OR SHE/THEY/ZHEM @AndrewWilis ) deleted it right away, and stated Sofia-Mary asked the same question to him.

That was Gwendolino contribution. erasing the traces, right?
I expected this, so I prepared for this!

No you didn't Sofia-Mary did, it's actually new name on top

But dont you worry, here is still a copy of your deleted message for everyone to see:

Got cha!
check mate BeDecentForAchange! LOL!

I do applaud you bringing some type of foundation for your claims for a change. That's a first and should be praised

@BeDecentForAChange said in #761:

Because his name was a boxer. Same guess would go that you're a dude from your overall tone, punctuation, and you have a dude's name

Assumptions Assumptions.
To it is true that you are 18 year old blonde bombshell with some black teints

@AndrewWilis said in #763:

Assumptions Assumptions.
To it is true that you are 18 year old blonde bombshell with some black teints

Yes ma'am

@Munich said in #749:

Sandbagging has been punished for maybe at least a decade, I think. This comment is just one of many where he talks of experience.

@AndrewWilis can't believe you let this one slide, my gender was assumed, please be outraged

@BeDecentForAChange said in #762:

I'm confident I can whip up a list of at least 100 players on Lichess with your opening repetoire

2 players, not 100, is enough. Or you have more accounts of yours? Please share them! :-)
XD

I know 2, and both posted in this thread, another coincident?

@Munich said in #766:

2 players, not 100, is enough. Or you have more accounts of yours? Please share them! :-)
XD

I know 2, and both posted in this thread, another coincident?

You mean that, if I give you 10 accounts with the same opening repertoire, you will have to admit that those are your accounts?

@Jseijp said in #758:

Am I still in the mix? I have been here almost 10 years. I can't recall playing the Englund. I do play e4 and the Sicilian, and I'm partial to a gambit or a sac from time to time.

My ratings are slighyly different too

@Munich please let me know if I'm also this guy like you claimed before

@ other readers.
just check gwendolino764, sort for black openings (that makes it easier) and look for Englund gambit. Then do the same for BeDecentForAChange.
1.d4 1...e5 - it is a very rare gambit, and it isnt in particular any good.

then look fout for this sicilian with ...e6

When you sort for white for both players, both do the italian, and there is a tendency by both players to play gambit lines.
I'd say this is like handwriting, pretty similar. it is maybe not as secure as a finger print, but if you invest more time, I am sure you find more similarities between Gwendolino764 and beDecentForAChange.
One thing in common is: both wrote in this thread.
ye out of 100.000 players you might find 2 or 3 with this opening repertoire, but both the same rating level, and both writing in this thread?? both with the expression "fixed it!"

These are not the only accounts that look very similar, but... I was asked to show one example, so I think the burden of proof is now with BeDecent, not me anymore. I found enough.

Edit: I want to point out, it could all be a coincidence. Having multiple accounts is against the fair terms of play with lichess: it would be abuse.