@possum_hollow said in #27:
Funny, everyone wants to belittle the chess knowledge of a 1200 rated player, talk about them making excuses for a loss, and so on. No one bothered to answer my question.
Your report was reviewed about two weeks ago, when you first reported the player. If no actions were notified to you it can be for two reasons:
- Nothing note-worthy was found and report was dismissed;
- Something suspicious was found but not enough to warrant direct action, hence pending deeper investigation.
Without going into details of your report, for obvious reasons, I will limit myself to say that the way you think accuracy % works is wrong or partially wrong and that it is not a trust worthy parameter to evaluate if someone is cheating.
I am part of the team of fair play moderators who train new moderators about cheating in general and Lichess counter measures. During my trainings I make sure that people understand that the accuracy % is useless and misleading in terms of cheat detection.
We have far better tools that either automatically detect cheating or that provide mods with extremely helpful data to judge if someone is cheating or not. Most of these tools are not accessible to the public. Some you can find on github and some not.
On a last note, reporting the same player over and over in a short timespan will not help your case, rather the contrary.
@possum_hollow said in #27:
> Funny, everyone wants to belittle the chess knowledge of a 1200 rated player, talk about them making excuses for a loss, and so on. No one bothered to answer my question.
Your report was reviewed about two weeks ago, when you first reported the player. If no actions were notified to you it can be for two reasons:
1) Nothing note-worthy was found and report was dismissed;
2) Something suspicious was found but not enough to warrant direct action, hence pending deeper investigation.
Without going into details of your report, for obvious reasons, I will limit myself to say that the way you think accuracy % works is wrong or partially wrong and that it is not a trust worthy parameter to evaluate if someone is cheating.
I am part of the team of fair play moderators who train new moderators about cheating in general and Lichess counter measures. During my trainings I make sure that people understand that the accuracy % is useless and misleading in terms of cheat detection.
We have far better tools that either automatically detect cheating or that provide mods with extremely helpful data to judge if someone is cheating or not. Most of these tools are not accessible to the public. Some you can find on github and some not.
On a last note, reporting the same player over and over in a short timespan will not help your case, rather the contrary.