- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Can't create game with specific side any more

I just try to start a correspondance where I want to play white (because I have another game in progress with black). 2 times I got black and left the game. I think my only way now is to have my second game on Chess.com :(

I just try to start a correspondance where I want to play white (because I have another game in progress with black). 2 times I got black and left the game. I think my only way now is to have my second game on Chess.com :(

@solo59 said in #393:

I just try to start a correspondance where I want to play white (because I have another game in progress with black). 2 times I got black and left the game. I think my only way now is to have my second game on Chess.com :(

You can invite someone to play and still pick color!

@solo59 said in #393: > I just try to start a correspondance where I want to play white (because I have another game in progress with black). 2 times I got black and left the game. I think my only way now is to have my second game on Chess.com :( You can invite someone to play and still pick color!

@BeDecentForAChange said in #392:

No, the code is working perfectly. This is not an intended feature of the site, there is no error in the code that causes this.

No, the code problem is not about the code does not run. There are missing parts, that bring the right people together, so that 1. all are paired quickly and 2. not random with colour players.

@BeDecentForAChange said in #392: > No, the code is working perfectly. This is not an intended feature of the site, there is no error in the code that causes this. No, the code problem is not about the code does not run. There are missing parts, that bring the right people together, so that 1. all are paired quickly and 2. not random with colour players.

@Sofia-Mary said in #395:

No, the code problem is not about the code does not run. There are missing parts, that bring the right people together, so that 1. all are paired quickly and 2. not random with colour players.

There are no missing parts, there were people abusing the site's features and exploiting fair players. They fixed it by making it all fair now. The code works better than before, it's perfect like this

@Sofia-Mary said in #395: > No, the code problem is not about the code does not run. There are missing parts, that bring the right people together, so that 1. all are paired quickly and 2. not random with colour players. There are no missing parts, there were people abusing the site's features and exploiting fair players. They fixed it by making it all fair now. The code works better than before, it's perfect like this

@BeDecentForAChange said in #394:

You can invite someone to play and still pick color!
And if he has nobody, he should play with a cold not talking mashine?

@BeDecentForAChange said in #394: > You can invite someone to play and still pick color! And if he has nobody, he should play with a cold not talking mashine?

@Sofia-Mary said in #397:

And if he has nobody, he should play with a cold not talking mashine?

Yes, or go to the lobby!

@Sofia-Mary said in #397: > And if he has nobody, he should play with a cold not talking mashine? Yes, or go to the lobby!

@BeDecentForAChange said in #340:

The only thing Lichess did is say "If you want more than normal advantageous settings for yourself, you need your opponent to agree to it, we won't force it on them anymore". That's a great thing, as it makes the platform fair for everyone

Ok, since you keep repeating this argument here like a prayer wheel, I'll ask you back very specifically:

How can I start a game where I can choose the “black” option (which is totally “advantageous” for me)?

@BeDecentForAChange said in #340: > The only thing Lichess did is say "If you want more than normal advantageous settings for yourself, you need your opponent to agree to it, we won't force it on them anymore". That's a great thing, as it makes the platform fair for everyone Ok, since you keep repeating this argument here like a prayer wheel, I'll ask you back very specifically: How can I start a game where I can choose the “black” option (which is totally “advantageous” for me)?
<Comment deleted by user>

@teddyd said in #399:

Ok, since you keep repeating this argument here like a prayer wheel, I'll ask you back very specifically:

How can I start a game where I can choose the “black” option (which is totally “advantageous” for me)?

Go to any player, click challenge, pick black

@teddyd said in #399: > Ok, since you keep repeating this argument here like a prayer wheel, I'll ask you back very specifically: > > How can I start a game where I can choose the “black” option (which is totally “advantageous” for me)? Go to any player, click challenge, pick black

@BeDecentForAChange said in #396:

There are no missing parts, there were people abusing the site's features and exploiting fair players. They fixed it by making it all fair now. The code works better than before, it's perfect like this

No. You already told us, that the wrong people are paired, the players do not have any response for this shit. And you guessed, that a lot do not know about the wrong code pairings. So, they can not abuse, they used a button to used for without knowing about the consequences.

There is a code problem you made clear to us, and now ...you fall back to older arguments?

@BeDecentForAChange said in #396: > There are no missing parts, there were people abusing the site's features and exploiting fair players. They fixed it by making it all fair now. The code works better than before, it's perfect like this No. You already told us, that the wrong people are paired, the players do not have any response for this shit. And you guessed, that a lot do not know about the wrong code pairings. So, they can not abuse, they used a button to used for without knowing about the consequences. There is a code problem you made clear to us, and now ...you fall back to older arguments?

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.