I have played so many cheaters here the past few days. They aren't even hiding it anymore. 1600 players with an accuracy of 94%. Nothing is being done about it. I think I will move sites.
I have played so many cheaters here the past few days. They aren't even hiding it anymore. 1600 players with an accuracy of 94%. Nothing is being done about it. I think I will move sites.
Here we go again...
Your opponent’s accuracy metric is relative to how well you play. If you make a lot of tactical blunders, don’t expect your opponents to overlook them. Blaming your losses on your opponents being cheaters is not a good look. Don’t play when you are tilted.
Here we go again...
Your opponent’s accuracy metric is relative to how well you play. If you make a lot of tactical blunders, don’t expect your opponents to overlook them. Blaming your losses on your opponents being cheaters is not a good look. Don’t play when you are tilted.
You make a couple of assumptions. First of all you claim i make a lot of blunders. I don't I just notice my opponent being 1600 happen to have a queen in the only spot where it covers everything like he anticipated a sequence 5 moves in. It's not a single match either. Turning your engine on and off during a match you will win every match sub 1800 if you want to. It just happens a lot on lichess and I see nothing being done about it. apart from people claiming either its not cheating or its bad play/ bad form.
You make a couple of assumptions. First of all you claim i make a lot of blunders. I don't I just notice my opponent being 1600 happen to have a queen in the only spot where it covers everything like he anticipated a sequence 5 moves in. It's not a single match either. Turning your engine on and off during a match you will win every match sub 1800 if you want to. It just happens a lot on lichess and I see nothing being done about it. apart from people claiming either its not cheating or its bad play/ bad form.
Can we have some examples?
Can we have some examples?
@LichLegend said in #4:
Can we have some examples?
Unfortunately not because naming and shaming is not allowed on the board. But why don't you believe my word for it?
@LichLegend said in #4:
> Can we have some examples?
Unfortunately not because naming and shaming is not allowed on the board. But why don't you believe my word for it?
@C-Bear said in #5:
Unfortunately not because naming and shaming is not allowed on the board. But why don't you believe my word for it?
Well we're around the same level and people have 94% accuracy pretty often in simple games. Also went through some of your games and your opponents seemed to just play solid and human moves.
@C-Bear said in #5:
> Unfortunately not because naming and shaming is not allowed on the board. But why don't you believe my word for it?
Well we're around the same level and people have 94% accuracy pretty often in simple games. Also went through some of your games and your opponents seemed to just play solid and human moves.
@C-Bear said in #1:
I have played so many cheaters here the past few days. They aren't even hiding it anymore. 1600 players with an accuracy of 94%. Nothing is being done about it. I think I will move sites.
94% accuracy means nothing on its own. I've had 98% accuracy twice in the last few days and it's not a sign that I was cheating or even playing very well. My opponent blundered, it's as simple as that.
@C-Bear said in #1:
> I have played so many cheaters here the past few days. They aren't even hiding it anymore. 1600 players with an accuracy of 94%. Nothing is being done about it. I think I will move sites.
94% accuracy means nothing on its own. I've had 98% accuracy twice in the last few days and it's not a sign that I was cheating or even playing very well. My opponent blundered, it's as simple as that.
@C-Bear said in #3:
You make a couple of assumptions. First of all you claim i make a lot of blunders. I don't I just notice my opponent being 1600 happen to have a queen in the only spot where it covers everything like he anticipated a sequence 5 moves in. It's not a single match either. Turning your engine on and off during a match you will win every match sub 1800 if you want to. It just happens a lot on lichess and I see nothing being done about it. apart from people claiming either its not cheating or its bad play/ bad form.
You do make a lot of blunders.
@C-Bear said in #3:
> You make a couple of assumptions. First of all you claim i make a lot of blunders. I don't I just notice my opponent being 1600 happen to have a queen in the only spot where it covers everything like he anticipated a sequence 5 moves in. It's not a single match either. Turning your engine on and off during a match you will win every match sub 1800 if you want to. It just happens a lot on lichess and I see nothing being done about it. apart from people claiming either its not cheating or its bad play/ bad form.
You do make a lot of blunders.
He made a normal number of blunders for someone of his rating, because he didn't cheat, unlike some others.
He made a normal number of blunders for someone of his rating, because he didn't cheat, unlike some others.
@C-Bear said in #5:
Unfortunately not because naming and shaming is not allowed on the board. But why don't you believe my word for it?
we dont believe your word for it because many people are exactly like this, complaining about cheaters.
@C-Bear said in #5:
> Unfortunately not because naming and shaming is not allowed on the board. But why don't you believe my word for it?
we dont believe your word for it because many people are exactly like this, complaining about cheaters.