I saw the bit where Trump repeated his lie about the amount of aid to Ukraine from the US as 300 billion and Europe 100 billion. He thane said "It's hard to believe."
At least he was true about that, of course it is hard to believe because it's completely untrue. I'm not sure why anyone would approve of a speech filled with blatant fabrications.
I saw the bit where Trump repeated his lie about the amount of aid to Ukraine from the US as 300 billion and Europe 100 billion. He thane said "It's hard to believe."
At least he was true about that, of course it is hard to believe because it's completely untrue. I'm not sure why anyone would approve of a speech filled with blatant fabrications.
Guys, check what is creation date of tiny mao account. Another fanatic of red color. Ask @clousems what will follow if you keep replying to this querulent user.
Zelensky is no ML.
Guys, check what is creation date of tiny mao account. Another fanatic of red color. Ask @clousems what will follow if you keep replying to this querulent user.
Zelensky is no ML.
@botliquor4547
If that's a reference to my personal troll, that's a different situation.
This guy may be in the camp of "MAGA zealot", but (outside of potential headaches, aggravation, and tendinitis from typing fact checks) I see no reason that people should avoid replying to him. Even if he's repeating one of the world's most obnoxious narratives, he is citing his sources, and his data is technically correct (even if it is being misinterpreted and misrepresented). I'll bet I can find some conservative news outlet that presented the same polling numbers in the same way (ie ignoring response bias, etc.)
If you disagree with what he's saying, prove him wrong. MAGA talking points are notoriously hard to defend without causing more problems.
@botliquor4547
If that's a reference to my personal troll, that's a different situation.
This guy may be in the camp of "MAGA zealot", but (outside of potential headaches, aggravation, and tendinitis from typing fact checks) I see no reason that people should avoid replying to him. Even if he's repeating one of the world's most obnoxious narratives, he is citing his sources, and his data is technically correct (even if it is being misinterpreted and misrepresented). I'll bet I can find some conservative news outlet that presented the same polling numbers in the same way (ie ignoring response bias, etc.)
If you disagree with what he's saying, prove him wrong. MAGA talking points are notoriously hard to defend without causing more problems.
@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #7:
Insane that 76% of Americans support invading my country for no reason,
So a lie and another lie. Okay.
Why can't MAGAS say three words in a row without having to lie. It's crazy.
If you ever read the report you'll find this data is published officially by the White House, not by this Maomao.
No wonder you always attack every word from the President and his disciples.
Still, thank Lichess and guys like clousems who still protect the freedom of speech - and the freedom of supporting Trump at modern days.
@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #7:
> Insane that 76% of Americans support invading my country for no reason,
>
> So a lie and another lie. Okay.
>
> Why can't MAGAS say three words in a row without having to lie. It's crazy.
If you ever read the report you'll find this data is published officially by the White House, not by this Maomao.
No wonder you always attack every word from the President and his disciples.
Still, thank Lichess and guys like clousems who still protect the freedom of speech - and the freedom of supporting Trump at modern days.
@Cheshire_the_Maomao said in #14:
If you ever read the report you'll find this data is published officially by the White House, not by this Maomao.
You're supposed to link the your own numbers yourself.
Anyway I don't believe a word on the Red House webpage so you're going to do better than that as a source haha. You need to find something believable.
No wonder you always attack every word from the President and his disciples.
Disciples is a good word for Trump's followers. It's a cult of mindless followers. Glad you know it yourself.
Still, thank Lichess and guys like clousems who still protect the freedom of speech - and the freedom of supporting Trump at modern days.
Oh I would prefer USA to get IP banned..
@Cheshire_the_Maomao said in #14:
> If you ever read the report you'll find this data is published officially by the White House, not by this Maomao.
You're supposed to link the your own numbers yourself.
Anyway I don't believe a word on the Red House webpage so you're going to do better than that as a source haha. You need to find something believable.
> No wonder you always attack every word from the President and his disciples.
Disciples is a good word for Trump's followers. It's a cult of mindless followers. Glad you know it yourself.
> Still, thank Lichess and guys like clousems who still protect the freedom of speech - and the freedom of supporting Trump at modern days.
Oh I would prefer USA to get IP banned..
It was a good speech imo. Dems were rather amusing with their silly little signs. Hope Al Green had a nice little walk. Couldn't believe they didn't applaud our newest secret service officer ( yes I know everything was choreographed). I do admire the few dems who had the courage to actually respond positively to a positive statement.
It was a good speech imo. Dems were rather amusing with their silly little signs. Hope Al Green had a nice little walk. Couldn't believe they didn't applaud our newest secret service officer ( yes I know everything was choreographed). I do admire the few dems who had the courage to actually respond positively to a positive statement.
@Dukedog said in #16:
It was a good speech imo. Dems were rather amusing with their silly little signs. Hope Al Green had a nice little walk. Couldn't believe they didn't applaud our newest secret service officer ( yes I know everything was choreographed). I do admire the few dems who had the courage to actually respond positively to a positive statement.
Yeah you think a speech with Trump wanting to invade my country is good.
Look in the mirror. You're not seing a good person. You're part of evil now.
@Dukedog said in #16:
> It was a good speech imo. Dems were rather amusing with their silly little signs. Hope Al Green had a nice little walk. Couldn't believe they didn't applaud our newest secret service officer ( yes I know everything was choreographed). I do admire the few dems who had the courage to actually respond positively to a positive statement.
Yeah you think a speech with Trump wanting to invade my country is good.
Look in the mirror. You're not seing a good person. You're part of evil now.
This is why I mean you're fascists in here.
You're like
Trump "Hey what about invading a country for no reason and grabbing their stuf? "
Liches "hear hear, sounds great!"
And then like giant hypocrites you get mad when somebody calls you out.
This is why I mean you're fascists in here.
You're like
Trump "Hey what about invading a country for no reason and grabbing their stuf? "
Liches "hear hear, sounds great!"
And then like giant hypocrites you get mad when somebody calls you out.
@Raspberry_yoghurt
I don't know how much @Dukedog paid attention to the specifics of Trump's speech. But as far as I got to know Dukedog he certainly wouldn't approve of any hostile action against NATO allies or other peaceful countries. And he certainly isn't a fascist but a decent man. Even if we disagree fiercely on how good or bad Trump's influence on the United States or the world is.
@Raspberry_yoghurt
I don't know how much @Dukedog paid attention to the specifics of Trump's speech. But as far as I got to know Dukedog he certainly wouldn't approve of any hostile action against NATO allies or other peaceful countries. And he certainly isn't a fascist but a decent man. Even if we disagree fiercely on how good or bad Trump's influence on the United States or the world is.
@Katzenschinken
Thank you.