<Comment deleted by user>
God that's an ugly url
if its a twitter thing just take a screenshot and upload it lmao
God that's an ugly url
if its a twitter thing just take a screenshot and upload it lmao
@salmon_rushdie said in #2:
God that's an ugly url
if its a twitter thing just take a screenshot and upload it lmao
yeah my CSS lord you are the genius here...
now he has your tracks fyi....
url is malicious.
Status code
HTTP response status code sent back by the server upon asking for the URL being studied.
400
@salmon_rushdie said in #2:
> God that's an ugly url
>
> if its a twitter thing just take a screenshot and upload it lmao
yeah my CSS lord you are the genius here...
https://www.virustotal.com/gui/url/8c2c6a4ae35fd4e93ae5b9c07123343de31b3903e19470cacd5cfaa494931a9f/detection/
now he has your tracks fyi....
url is malicious.
Status code
HTTP response status code sent back by the server upon asking for the URL being studied.
400
A curious developer clicked on a shady link,
Little did they know, their browser was about to sink.
The page loaded up, with CSS so strange,
Suddenly their screen, started to rearrange!
css:
body {
background-color: red;
font-size: 500px;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 9999;
}
Massive red text, covered the entire view,
Impossible to read, or know what to do.
Popups appeared, with links to bad sites,
The developer panicked, in pure CSS frights.
But then they realized, it was just a silly prank,
Malicious CSS, was the culprit to thank.
A good lesson learned, about clicking with care,
Next time they'll think twice, before going there.
The moral of the story, is quite clear,
Malicious CSS, can cause quite the fear.
So be wise, my friends, and heed this advice,
Avoid shady links, to prevent CSS vice.
A curious developer clicked on a shady link,
Little did they know, their browser was about to sink.
The page loaded up, with CSS so strange,
Suddenly their screen, started to rearrange!
css:
body {
background-color: red;
font-size: 500px;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
z-index: 9999;
}
Massive red text, covered the entire view,
Impossible to read, or know what to do.
Popups appeared, with links to bad sites,
The developer panicked, in pure CSS frights.
But then they realized, it was just a silly prank,
Malicious CSS, was the culprit to thank.
A good lesson learned, about clicking with care,
Next time they'll think twice, before going there.
The moral of the story, is quite clear,
Malicious CSS, can cause quite the fear.
So be wise, my friends, and heed this advice,
Avoid shady links, to prevent CSS vice.
Clear cache and history in browser then on pc as well, restart browser in safe mode along with a scanner running, my lord.
Clear cache and history in browser then on pc as well, restart browser in safe mode along with a scanner running, my lord.
The orange clown is spreading every single conspiracy theory that rises from the dregs of the internet, the latest being the one of migrants eating cats and dogs. But it is the Dems who are the fearmongerers. Yeah, right!
We are in fucking La-la land.
The orange clown is spreading every single conspiracy theory that rises from the dregs of the internet, the latest being the one of migrants eating cats and dogs. But it is the Dems who are the fearmongerers. Yeah, right!
We are in fucking La-la land.
CRDF is known and recognise'd as pioneer in this where all others fail:
Their unique approach draws on our extensive history of building institutional capacities. We engage the cyber community at all levels to ensure current and aspiring cybersecurity leaders are ready to take on rapidly evolving cyber threats. We build awareness of these threats and teach ‘cyber hygiene’ skills, including two-factor authentication, phishing avoidance, and social engineering. Our global network enables us to maximize partnerships with local stakeholders to build robust responses to cyber-attacks, counter malign influence, and strengthen each country’s technical capabilities and partnership.
CRDF is known and recognise'd as pioneer in this where all others fail:
Their unique approach draws on our extensive history of building institutional capacities. We engage the cyber community at all levels to ensure current and aspiring cybersecurity leaders are ready to take on rapidly evolving cyber threats. We build awareness of these threats and teach ‘cyber hygiene’ skills, including two-factor authentication, phishing avoidance, and social engineering. Our global network enables us to maximize partnerships with local stakeholders to build robust responses to cyber-attacks, counter malign influence, and strengthen each country’s technical capabilities and partnership.
Ok did not know that the link I posted could give personal information, deleted it and thank you for the warning.
Ok did not know that the link I posted could give personal information, deleted it and thank you for the warning.
GO VIVEK!!!
GO VIVEK!!!
In my humble opinion, calling somebody "the orange clown" doesn't diminish anger, does it?
I consider what Trump has been put through for many years in a row, and then, nevertheless, I now find some expressing outrage .... about what? About Trump passing along a "disappearing pet story?" Huh. That doesn't seem all that outrageous unless deliberately false (which seems unlikely), especially compared to some claims NOT made by Trump but rather to his disadvantage, for several years.
It suddenly seems to me -- things HAVE gotten strange. But probably not in the same way that some others believe.
Is it possible, @Katzenschinken , that at least ONE pet MIGHT have disappeared? Is that remotely possible? Have you actually checked in depth? Or was the early "reporting" in response to Trump's mention of the alleged situation all we might ever need to hear, and utterly nonpartisan?
Do we all think "fact checking" is always done rigorously and enthusiastically with respect to BOTH sides?
And even if no pets have disappeared, do you think the local townspeople think everything is great? Or is that just beside the point. Inevitably.
In my humble opinion, calling somebody "the orange clown" doesn't diminish anger, does it?
I consider what Trump has been put through for many years in a row, and then, nevertheless, I now find some expressing outrage .... about what? About Trump passing along a "disappearing pet story?" Huh. That doesn't seem all that outrageous unless deliberately false (which seems unlikely), especially compared to some claims NOT made by Trump but rather to his disadvantage, for several years.
It suddenly seems to me -- things HAVE gotten strange. But probably not in the same way that some others believe.
Is it possible, @Katzenschinken , that at least ONE pet MIGHT have disappeared? Is that remotely possible? Have you actually checked in depth? Or was the early "reporting" in response to Trump's mention of the alleged situation all we might ever need to hear, and utterly nonpartisan?
Do we all think "fact checking" is always done rigorously and enthusiastically with respect to BOTH sides?
And even if no pets have disappeared, do you think the local townspeople think everything is great? Or is that just beside the point. Inevitably.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.




