@BeaverB1xQD8 said in #55:
> 1. It is red or it is blue.
> 2. It is not blue.
> 3. Therefore, it is red.
>
> @me >Post video showing Hans cheating online
> @Nomoreusernames >not OTB cheating proof = nope, not a cheater
>
> @me >a cheater IS cheater (by definition ), (by rule of law), (by principle), (by social contract), (by all means)
> @Nomoreusernames >not OTB proof = not a cheater
>
> @me >...
> @Nomoreusernames >I'm not done, please answer me
>
> @me >...
> @Nomoreusernames >post video of Magnus cheating in ONLINE
>
> ONLINE ONLINE ONLINE ONLINE ONLINE ONLINE ONLINE
>
> 1. It is red or it is blue.
> 2. It is not blue.
> 3. Therefore, it is red.
>
> 1. It is a cheater or not a cheater.
> 2. It is not OTB.
> 3. Therefore, it is NOT a cheater.
>
> flawed
Bet?
@Nomoreusernames said in #56:
> Your attempt at sarcasm failed. Your flawed logic did in fact "get you". Whether your ego accepts it or not, others will.
> If you can get reach a point where you consider all the factual info and can rationally and with introspection, correct your thinking, then you have won!
>
> [...]
>
> Stop making stuff up, that's the first step towards being able to find the truth. If your story relies on lies, then that is a clue to reassess what you think. The clever people have to do that, that's how they became clever.
Bet?
@Nomoreusernames said in #58:
> I am not claiming that Niemann didn't cheat.
1. did he cheat or not.
2. I am not claiming that he didn't cheat.
3. Therefore, he cheated.
it took you all this trolling crap posted in pure bad faith to finally admit he, namely Hans Niemann, cheated, AND only after I've cornered you by breaking down your aphorisms in a unvoidable trap.
@Nomoreusernames
> Are you trying to say you think there is no room for Magnus in chess?
Yes, Magnus cheated (I trust you on this one) and should be treated equally.
END
@BeaverB1xQD8 said in #62:
> 1. did he cheat or not.
> 2. I am not claiming that he didn't cheat.
> 3. Therefore, he cheated.
> it took you all this trolling crap posted in pure bad faith to finally admit he, namely Hans Niemann, cheated, AND only after I've cornered you by breaking down your aphorisms in a unvoidable trap.
> @Nomoreusernames
> Yes, Magnus cheated (I trust you on this one) and should be treated equally.
> END
I did take your comment to be sarcasm, it was presumptive of me, and I apologise for that.
I have not however, said Niemann never cheated, he admitted to cheating. And I don't agree that Magnus has no place in chess.
"Hans Niemann Effect" strikes again
2022 Fall Chess Classic A
Round 8: Nyzhnyk, Illya (2687) vs Niemann, Hans (2699)
Niemann, Hans Moke
-------------------------------
0 Inaccuracies
0 Errors
0 Blunders
15 Avg. centipawn loss
96% Accuracy
https://lichess.org/broadcast/2022-fall-chess-classic-a-group/round-8/0iBIGZ34
@RPO-599 said in #60:
> Are you making a bet? :)
Yes, i am making
@BeaverB1xQD8 said in #62:
> Yes, Magnus cheated (I trust you on this one) and should be treated equally.
I wouldn't call it cheating exactly, but it's the same sort of fair-play violation Hans admitted to doing in the past while streaming.
@KiHjJjH said in #66:
> Yes, i am making
Finally someone with balls!
What's yer bet?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.