@Enders_Gambit
If I'm actually playing against people at my elo, then I should statistically lose 50% of my games, but I'm losing damn near all of them. I also play on Chess com, and there's cheating there is as well, but I heard there was less here..I'm not sure that's the case because I'm on a massive losing streak the likes which I haven't seen since I first started almost a year ago.
I mean no offense, but it sounds like you're being paranoid and letting the rating system cloud your judgment. And this can affect your performance.
I don't want to get into just how bad the cheating is necessarily, but I just want someone in charge to actually look at some of these games. I don't go off accuracy because cheaters tend to make purposeful mistakes so in order not to get banned. The biggest thing I look at is time per move as well just their supposed skill level vs mine.
Once again, I mean no offense, but in my opinion, you're in the rating range where the majority of your move choices are devoid of tactical motif.
Despite this, you raise an interesting point about player misconduct/cheating. I might be wrong but, I do believe you're most likely being outplayed fairly. I understand that you have your own thoughts and feelings based on your understanding of the game. However, I'd advise against judging your opponents based on your intuitive understanding of the game; otherwise, you risk misjudging them.
Mind you, this isn't limited to players at your level. All players should have and maintain a neutral mindset toward their opponent's performance and not judge them unfairly.
We all make mistakes on the board and such. However, one mistake we should avoid as chess players is assuming that we'll frequently encounter cheaters.
What's often overlooked is that misjudging other people's performance reflects poorly on your intuitive abilities, as it can make you look stupid in reality, as a matter of fact.
And as you probably know, this isn't new to the chess world. Some people believe they frequently encounter cheaters. And when these people are unable to recognize their own flaws and shortcomings, they're likely to pass snap judgments on their opponents, resulting in a vicious cycle of negativity and mistrust.
What makes matters worse is when they go public with it. Whenever these people are suspicious of their opponent's performance, they take the issue to the forums and let everyone hear their thoughts. And when their suspected games are analyzed, their mistakes/blunders are often too obvious to the masses, unknowingly telling the world just how bad they are at chess.
One may think they're publicly shaming their opponents in some way, but they're actually shaming themselves directly.
While I'd advise you to maintain a neutral stance in situations like these, I'd also advise you to keep your opinions to yourself because the report button is there to keep things discreet and civil whenever you feel suspicious.
@Enders_Gambit
> If I'm actually playing against people at my elo, then I should statistically lose 50% of my games, but I'm losing damn near all of them. I also play on Chess com, and there's cheating there is as well, but I heard there was less here..I'm not sure that's the case because I'm on a massive losing streak the likes which I haven't seen since I first started almost a year ago.
I mean no offense, but it sounds like you're being paranoid and letting the rating system cloud your judgment. And this can affect your performance.
> I don't want to get into just how bad the cheating is necessarily, but I just want someone in charge to actually look at some of these games. I don't go off accuracy because cheaters tend to make purposeful mistakes so in order not to get banned. The biggest thing I look at is time per move as well just their supposed skill level vs mine.
Once again, I mean no offense, but in my opinion, you're in the rating range where the majority of your move choices are devoid of tactical motif.
Despite this, you raise an interesting point about player misconduct/cheating. I might be wrong but, I do believe you're most likely being outplayed fairly. I understand that you have your own thoughts and feelings based on your understanding of the game. However, I'd advise against judging your opponents based on your intuitive understanding of the game; otherwise, you risk misjudging them.
Mind you, this isn't limited to players at your level. All players should have and maintain a neutral mindset toward their opponent's performance and not judge them unfairly.
We all make mistakes on the board and such. However, one mistake we should avoid as chess players is assuming that we'll frequently encounter cheaters.
What's often overlooked is that misjudging other people's performance reflects poorly on your intuitive abilities, as it can make you look stupid in reality, as a matter of fact.
And as you probably know, this isn't new to the chess world. Some people believe they frequently encounter cheaters. And when these people are unable to recognize their own flaws and shortcomings, they're likely to pass snap judgments on their opponents, resulting in a vicious cycle of negativity and mistrust.
What makes matters worse is when they go public with it. Whenever these people are suspicious of their opponent's performance, they take the issue to the forums and let everyone hear their thoughts. And when their suspected games are analyzed, their mistakes/blunders are often too obvious to the masses, unknowingly telling the world just how bad they are at chess.
One may think they're publicly shaming their opponents in some way, but they're actually shaming themselves directly.
While I'd advise you to maintain a neutral stance in situations like these, I'd also advise you to keep your opinions to yourself because the report button is there to keep things discreet and civil whenever you feel suspicious.