by the way legend can you do something about the time discrepancies specially in bullet chess. I keep on clicking and reclicking my pieces and cant pick them up and even if i do my time still ticks.
it annoys me and most of the time costs me the game. if it is on a real chess board that wouldn't happen.
thanks
my favorite player is lasker, tal and nezhmetdinov.
"you dont have to play perfect chess just play better than your opponent" - emmanuel lasker (world champion)
chess psychology ... it works
by the way if you want to see proof of me being the champion i can send you pictures of my medals and trophy just give me your email address..
ill send it directly to you if you want proof
thanks
the games you played with kai were played with an engine. he was using one and you beat him. not only that, but exactly what legend said: your move times were consistently slow, even in the
openings, our algorithm flagged you for suspicious behavior, and the game aligns very closely with the output of known engines.
and nobody asked who your favorite players are. it has nothing to do with the discussion. stop dissembling.
your algorithm is flawed...if a move is obvious then if for an important reason i have to attend to something and did not immediately made a move how can you determine that?
reshevsky take long time in making a move in the opening
tal make wild moves and so is nezh and lasker
chess is also an art how can you put that statistics and trust your judgment to a computer or your gut feel.
that's the reason chess survived all this centuries because you cannot put it in a box and learn all its subtlety somewhere someone will challenge a notion that so many people hold dearly and change
it.
tal to his contemporaries are to put it "unlearned and making wild moves" but became a champion
examples are the way the sicilian is played by fischer before it was thought black is a waiting game.
you are good guys with good intentions but i think along the way of you policing this site there is something wrong.
you will end up as the only ones on top...
goodluck
you are the moderator so you can do whatever you want. but it is sad that i be labeled a cheater.
the only way to prove my position is if i can only play you personally on a real chessboard but for now I give up and surrender to your whims.
But I applaud your site. Its cool whats your real name mb? and where you from?
by the way regarding kai...engines are really stupid! you can set traps to those things they are "material cookie monsters".
you said, "your algorithm is flawed...if a move is obvious then if for an important reason i have to attend to something and did not immediately made a move how can you determine that?"
the algorithm is not perfect, but it does pick up key indicators. in your case, for example, with move times, it was not a one or two move thing; your moves were consistently slow, from beginning to
end. especially in the opening, when a skilled player should not be taking ~5,6,7 seconds on every move.
that wasn't the only thing. we take into account many factors and patterns before deciding to reset somebody. there are known indicators used not only by us but other sites on the web with engine
abuse enforcement. common sense also plays a role.
as for tal and his wild moves, he was a GM and a world class player who memorised much classical theory and conventional systems in order to get to the level where he could afford to make
unconventional moves from time to time. also there was often a method to his madness. if the wild moves didn't make some sense on a fundamental level he wouldn't have won so many games or contended
for the world title. ie. there is order in the universe, and also in chess; Tal's brilliance was no exception.
also, it's not my site. This is thibault's site. I just play and work here :).
last thing you said is, "by the way regarding kai...engines are really stupid! you can set traps to those things they are 'material cookie monsters'."
This is complete nonsense. where did you set a "material" trap for kai? Because I just looked over your two games with him and I don't see one. Engines are not really stupid. Many of them are
conventionally rated in excess of 3000.
if kasparov played here and will not disclose his identity how can you decide on his rating in this site?
you said:"as for tal and his wild moves, he was a GM and a world class player"
if he played here and did not disclose his identity?
wild on some games and finesse in other games?
How will you decide?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.