Isn't Chess.com simply better than Lichess ?

Showing that you have used a feature on a site you are critizing isn't a personal attack.

There is room for both lichess.org and chess.com.

@lovlas No, he is actively trying to undermine my personal credibility by showing stats that he firstly didn't calculate correctly and secondly presented without the context I gave him on chess.com. He wants to make me look like a hypocrite which I think is a personal attack.

hypocrite... strong word

But that's his insinuation... "Sounds like he has found something worthwhile on Chess.com." What do you think he means by that? I interpreted it in the way "He says chess.com is bad, but actually he is enjoying it." And that interpretation is the textbook definition of 'hypocrite'. Or am I misinterpreting sth?

He probably said it because you have been using it? If you are using it it can't be all bad.

somehow that's where all the rich people go

@lovlas Yeah, I'm using it. But you are now just following his argument. Did you read that I don't play puzzle rush because I like chess.com and I would pay for it (Maybe you are under the misconception that I bought I premium membership - sth else he misrepresented - I won it in the PCL Fantasy contest)?

@deepLA What do you mean?

So you are using it because you have to.

i mean the sub-millionaires play on that site