There is video evidence of him clearly not cheating against Magnus. I am genuinely asking how it is even possible for him to have cheated there. People who are determined to witch-hunt Niemann do not seem to want to answer this very simple question.
There is video evidence of him clearly not cheating against Magnus. I am genuinely asking how it is even possible for him to have cheated there. People who are determined to witch-hunt Niemann do not seem to want to answer this very simple question.
I would highly recommend that nobody discuss methods of cheating, or cheat detection, within these forums ever again.
Discussions of the matter are 100% deficit with no benefit.
Only bad comes of it.
There is no need to host "how to cheat better" threads in this forum.
There is no need to make it harder to catch cheaters.
There is no need to raise suspicion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1Wiok4H1RY
I would highly recommend that nobody discuss methods of cheating, or cheat detection, within these forums ever again.
Discussions of the matter are 100% deficit with no benefit.
Only bad comes of it.
There is no need to host "how to cheat better" threads in this forum.
There is no need to make it harder to catch cheaters.
There is no need to raise suspicion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X1Wiok4H1RY
Why are so many people jumping on Niemann's dick these days? Just stop. He cheated.
Why are so many people jumping on Niemann's dick these days? Just stop. He cheated.
@Tim_Pool said in #3:
Why are so many people jumping on Niemann's dick these days? Just stop. He cheated.
Give proof
@Tim_Pool said in #3:
> Why are so many people jumping on Niemann's dick these days? Just stop. He cheated.
Give proof
@Onyx_Chess said in #2:
I would highly recommend that nobody discuss methods of cheating, or cheat detection, within these forums ever again.
Discussions of the matter are 100% deficit with no benefit.
Only bad comes of it.
There is no need to host "how to cheat better" threads in this forum.
There is no need to make it harder to catch cheaters.
There is no need to raise suspicion.
The point is that people are accusing without proof but whatever.
I do not need to learn how to cheat. Most people already know how. We just choose not to.
@Onyx_Chess said in #2:
> I would highly recommend that nobody discuss methods of cheating, or cheat detection, within these forums ever again.
> Discussions of the matter are 100% deficit with no benefit.
>
> Only bad comes of it.
>
> There is no need to host "how to cheat better" threads in this forum.
> There is no need to make it harder to catch cheaters.
> There is no need to raise suspicion.
The point is that people are accusing without proof but whatever.
I do not need to learn how to cheat. Most people already know how. We just choose not to.
@LillyStrikesBack said in #5:
The point is that people are accusing without proof but whatever.
I do not need to learn how to cheat. Most people already know how. We just choose not to.
There is a large group of people (including Carlsen himself) that just doesn't trust him. Saying those people accuse him of cheating and should prove it is just a bad debating strategy.
Asking people who say he didn't cheat OTB to prove he didn't cheat would be equally silly.
@LillyStrikesBack said in #5:
> The point is that people are accusing without proof but whatever.
>
> I do not need to learn how to cheat. Most people already know how. We just choose not to.
There is a large group of people (including Carlsen himself) that just doesn't trust him. Saying those people accuse him of cheating and should prove it is just a bad debating strategy.
Asking people who say he didn't cheat OTB to prove he didn't cheat would be equally silly.
@Molurus said in #6:
There is a large group of people (including Carlsen himself) that just doesn't trust him. Saying those people accuse him of cheating and should prove it is just a bad debating strategy.
Asking people who say he didn't cheat OTB to prove he didn't cheat would be equally silly.
But there IS proof he didn't cheat. There is literally a video that is clearly showing him not cheating.
@Molurus said in #6:
> There is a large group of people (including Carlsen himself) that just doesn't trust him. Saying those people accuse him of cheating and should prove it is just a bad debating strategy.
>
> Asking people who say he didn't cheat OTB to prove he didn't cheat would be equally silly.
But there IS proof he didn't cheat. There is literally a video that is clearly showing him not cheating.
@LillyStrikesBack said in #7:
But there IS proof he didn't cheat. There is literally a video that is clearly showing him not cheating.
You can't possibly prove a negative. That's a common fallacy.
@LillyStrikesBack said in #7:
> But there IS proof he didn't cheat. There is literally a video that is clearly showing him not cheating.
You can't possibly prove a negative. That's a common fallacy.
@Molurus said in #8:
You can't possibly prove a negative. That's a common fallacy.
Ok whatever
@Molurus said in #8:
> You can't possibly prove a negative. That's a common fallacy.
Ok whatever
@LillyStrikesBack said in #9:
Ok whatever
And on the assumption than you actually believe it is proven that Hans didn't cheat, your OP can only be a troll post. There would be no need to prove the opposite.
@LillyStrikesBack said in #9:
> Ok whatever
And on the assumption than you actually believe it is proven that Hans didn't cheat, your OP can only be a troll post. There would be no need to prove the opposite.