- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

I found GothamChess's Lichess account

#31
<Comment deleted by user>
#32

nice find @KDMFan i think it is Gothams old account

nice find @KDMFan i think it is Gothams old account
#33
<Comment deleted by user>
#34

i am not being sarcastic i do think that this was levis old account

i am not being sarcastic i do think that this was levis old account
#35
<Comment deleted by user>
#36

@DuBiOuSikUn said in #27:

Drdrunckenstein can't be Magnus! (I dare say this seriously) I've played lots of bullet games against him and I even have a positive score. His level is far from the world champion. As I've known, DrNykterstein is the real Magnus, with a 3300+ rating on bullet.

Bere in mind that bullet performance may not be indicative of ones abilities on the longer time formats.

@DuBiOuSikUn said in #27: > Drdrunckenstein can't be Magnus! (I dare say this seriously) I've played lots of bullet games against him and I even have a positive score. His level is far from the world champion. As I've known, DrNykterstein is the real Magnus, with a 3300+ rating on bullet. Bere in mind that bullet performance may not be indicative of ones abilities on the longer time formats.
#37

@ChefBob said in #26:

There is a levy bot. That right there should be enough. His wikipedia page states he has been a streaming partner with them for many years. You can check who he follows. Lastly you can go to his linkedin..

Yes. He is partnered with chess.com. There is no question about that. Maybe he is also an employee (there is a difference). But I don't care much about that distinction. My question is about the 'because'.

He said like that because he is a chess.com employee.

Are all chess.com employees/partners required to badmouth lichess? Is Levy so dishonest that he expresses false opinions just to please his "employer"? I want to know why the poster is making these accusations, and which one is he making.

@ChefBob said in #26: > There is a levy bot. That right there should be enough. His wikipedia page states he has been a streaming partner with them for many years. You can check who he follows. Lastly you can go to his linkedin.. Yes. He is partnered with chess.com. There is no question about that. Maybe he is also an employee (there is a difference). But I don't care much about that distinction. My question is about the 'because'. > He said like that because he is a chess.com employee. Are all chess.com employees/partners required to badmouth lichess? Is Levy so dishonest that he expresses false opinions just to please his "employer"? I want to know why the poster is making these accusations, and which one is he making.
#38

@Russell_Gladwin said in #28:

@heallan I am on your side. @mcgoves how are you so sure that Levy Rozman shares a lichess account with three other people?

He doesn't. He shares it with two other people.

If you go to the Crew64 page and click on the streamer icon (microphone), you go here:
https://lichess.org/streamer/Crew64

... which has the text I quoted. Then I read the text.

@Russell_Gladwin said in #28: > @heallan I am on your side. @mcgoves how are you so sure that Levy Rozman shares a lichess account with three other people? He doesn't. He shares it with two other people. If you go to the Crew64 page and click on the streamer icon (microphone), you go here: https://lichess.org/streamer/Crew64 ... which has the text I quoted. Then I read the text.
#39

@mcgoves said in #38:

He doesn't. He shares it with two other people.

If you go to the Crew64 page and click on the streamer icon (microphone), you go here:
lichess.org/streamer/Crew64

... which has the text I quoted. Then I read the text.

I feel for you being questioned while you are afk @mcgoves, but all of this misses the point: this Mr Levy is clearly a very able chess player - can we agree on this?

@mcgoves said in #38: > He doesn't. He shares it with two other people. > > If you go to the Crew64 page and click on the streamer icon (microphone), you go here: > lichess.org/streamer/Crew64 > > ... which has the text I quoted. Then I read the text. I feel for you being questioned while you are afk @mcgoves, but all of this misses the point: this Mr Levy is clearly a very able chess player - can we agree on this?
#40

Levy is an excellent chess player. And I'm sure a fine human being. But that is not the point of this thread.

Levy is an excellent chess player. And I'm sure a fine human being. But that is not the point of this thread.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.