<Comment deleted by user>
@Russell_Gladwin said in #7:
But people always ask him why he uses chess.com and he says that lichess.org sucks. He said that on video so why would he have a lichess account?
He said like that because he is a chess.com employee.
@Russell_Gladwin said in #7:
> But people always ask him why he uses chess.com and he says that lichess.org sucks. He said that on video so why would he have a lichess account?
He said like that because he is a chess.com employee.
@Russell_Gladwin said in #11:
I agree but if he said it on the video in front of many people, why would he use it?
It's a shared account. Maybe his collaborators prefer lichess.
Crew64 is a trio of chess educators and entertainers, led by FM Levy Rozman with two co-stars IM Alex Ostrovskiy and NM Alexis Paredes. We play everything from Ultrabullet to Classical Horde (maybe not) and we banter with the viewers on a variety of subjects.
@Russell_Gladwin said in #11:
> I agree but if he said it on the video in front of many people, why would he use it?
It's a shared account. Maybe his collaborators prefer lichess.
> Crew64 is a trio of chess educators and entertainers, led by FM Levy Rozman with two co-stars IM Alex Ostrovskiy and NM Alexis Paredes. We play everything from Ultrabullet to Classical Horde (maybe not) and we banter with the viewers on a variety of subjects.
@airfloo said in #9:
How much of your lifetime did you give up for finding out about this?
3 minutes.
BTW, who clicked the YouTube link, because he shows the Drunkenstein account.
@airfloo said in #9:
> How much of your lifetime did you give up for finding out about this?
3 minutes.
BTW, who clicked the YouTube link, because he shows the Drunkenstein account.
He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess.
He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess.
@ChefBob said in #15:
He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess.
Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors?
@ChefBob said in #15:
> He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess.
Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors?
@mcgoves said in #16:
Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors?
Whose side are you actually on?!
@mcgoves said in #16:
> Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors?
Whose side are you actually on?!
Am I supposed to pick a side? Why?
I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine.
I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil.
That's just juvenile sports fan behavior.
Am I supposed to pick a side? Why?
I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine.
I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil.
That's just juvenile sports fan behavior.
@mcgoves said in #18:
Am I supposed to pick a side? Why?
I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine.
I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil.That's just juvenile sports fan behavior.
No, this is Lichess, and you are promoting rival sites - just seems somewhat counter-productive to the aims of this site, that's all.
@mcgoves said in #18:
> Am I supposed to pick a side? Why?
> I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine.
> I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil.
>
> That's just juvenile sports fan behavior.
No, this is Lichess, and you are promoting rival sites - just seems somewhat counter-productive to the aims of this site, that's all.
Promoting? Read it again.
Promoting? Read it again.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.

