- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

I found GothamChess's Lichess account

<Comment deleted by user>

@Russell_Gladwin said in #7:

But people always ask him why he uses chess.com and he says that lichess.org sucks. He said that on video so why would he have a lichess account?
He said like that because he is a chess.com employee.

@Russell_Gladwin said in #7: > But people always ask him why he uses chess.com and he says that lichess.org sucks. He said that on video so why would he have a lichess account? He said like that because he is a chess.com employee.

@Russell_Gladwin said in #11:

I agree but if he said it on the video in front of many people, why would he use it?

It's a shared account. Maybe his collaborators prefer lichess.

Crew64 is a trio of chess educators and entertainers, led by FM Levy Rozman with two co-stars IM Alex Ostrovskiy and NM Alexis Paredes. We play everything from Ultrabullet to Classical Horde (maybe not) and we banter with the viewers on a variety of subjects.

@Russell_Gladwin said in #11: > I agree but if he said it on the video in front of many people, why would he use it? It's a shared account. Maybe his collaborators prefer lichess. > Crew64 is a trio of chess educators and entertainers, led by FM Levy Rozman with two co-stars IM Alex Ostrovskiy and NM Alexis Paredes. We play everything from Ultrabullet to Classical Horde (maybe not) and we banter with the viewers on a variety of subjects.

@airfloo said in #9:

How much of your lifetime did you give up for finding out about this?

3 minutes.

BTW, who clicked the YouTube link, because he shows the Drunkenstein account.

@airfloo said in #9: > How much of your lifetime did you give up for finding out about this? 3 minutes. BTW, who clicked the YouTube link, because he shows the Drunkenstein account.

He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess.

He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess.

@ChefBob said in #15:

He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess.

Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors?

@ChefBob said in #15: > He has a contract with chess.com is why he doesnt use lichess. Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors?

@mcgoves said in #16:

Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors?

Whose side are you actually on?!

@mcgoves said in #16: > Has he said this? Are you just repeating what you see said by chess.com detractors? Whose side are you actually on?!

Am I supposed to pick a side? Why?
I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine.
I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil.

That's just juvenile sports fan behavior.

Am I supposed to pick a side? Why? I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine. I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil. That's just juvenile sports fan behavior.

@mcgoves said in #18:

Am I supposed to pick a side? Why?
I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine.
I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil.

That's just juvenile sports fan behavior.

No, this is Lichess, and you are promoting rival sites - just seems somewhat counter-productive to the aims of this site, that's all.

@mcgoves said in #18: > Am I supposed to pick a side? Why? > I know which streamers I like. But that doesn't mean all the others are dishonest. Or that they will lose to mine. > I know which websites I like. But that doesn't mean the others are evil. > > That's just juvenile sports fan behavior. No, this is Lichess, and you are promoting rival sites - just seems somewhat counter-productive to the aims of this site, that's all.

Promoting? Read it again.

Promoting? Read it again.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.