Well, @Swapneel1 has a point.
But the lichess website is cleaner, and has less cheaters, and recieves updates on a daily basis.
Well, @Swapneel1 has a point.
But the lichess website is cleaner, and has less cheaters, and recieves updates on a daily basis.
Yes @Savage_Cactus
But seriously @Swapneel1 you're just going to get a lot of downvotes and a lot of people who are mad at you here. Do this poll on r/chess in reddit. It's equeal ground there.
But seriously @Swapneel1 you're just going to get a lot of downvotes and a lot of people who are mad at you here. Do this poll on r/chess in reddit. It's equeal ground there.
chess.com is no good. there are a lot of cheaters and a lot of accounts that are getting closed for no reason.
chess.com is no good. there are a lot of cheaters and a lot of accounts that are getting closed for no reason.
@goosefeathers I agree. Lichess created for chess. Chess.com sucks really, totally business oriented.
@goosefeathers I agree. Lichess created for chess. Chess.com sucks really, totally business oriented.
#Ilovelichess
lichess must fix the bloated rating system. Other than that lichess is great.
lichess must fix the bloated rating system. Other than that lichess is great.
@difford lichess doesnt use elo so if you have a 1600 rating, you arent 1600 elo, even acording to lichess.
@difford lichess doesnt use elo so if you have a 1600 rating, you arent 1600 elo, even acording to lichess.
@ruzgar9543 My point is that lichess should use a rating system that approximates elo, so we have a better appreciation of where we stand.
@ruzgar9543 My point is that lichess should use a rating system that approximates elo, so we have a better appreciation of where we stand.
You mean like glicko-2?