Positional themes

https://en.lichess.org/gVxnYhJm8KHc

an amazing game in my opinion, truly positional
I put his rooks in useless squares, I think its the epitome of positional play because it has a pawn closed structure
and its also a c4 game which I dont play that, I never play that
but I have a challengue now, I want to beat stockfish level 6 with all the openings as White and if I dont get tired perhaps later as black but I dont think so because I cant choose the opening
so I would just play pawn center games,
here is the link
https://en.lichess.org/forum/game-analysis/stockfish-level-6-collection

So if u want some explanation about the game I just posted its a,
its about a positional exchange I prefer the knight tan the rook there because my pawns are awesome and also about maneuvering and trying to promote no, so thats what I did
and then I decided to try to find a cool checkmate although that was quite erratic because I was not inspired but then I t finally came out, its just that, when u play the engine the engine never resigns so you have to keep playing and also the engine likes to sack pieces to avoid the checkmate so its not that easy plus the stalemate rule as well which is ridiculous no, but anyway.
Its fun and good training as well to play against the dry engine
because u have to play solid moves more or less, instead of crappy play, because the engine sees discovered attacks and all that stuff usually, so its just the way it is more of a grind feeling usually.

https://en.lichess.org/LYSf3pz8/black#96

flexibility in the position with attack in both wings and locked bishop

these type of positions are very sharp and hard to play correctly for both sides
in general its not recommended to not castle and leave the king in the middle but sometimes it works.
I think its a nice game because its imbalanced, if u want imbalanced game to avoid a draw maybe, so that one player can win.
there are other ideas as well I mean u can always explore deeply a game, like discovered attacks pawn pushes and that type of stuff.
u dont always need to play the same type of setup thats what I mean, like the berlin, because we are no gms, so it does not matter that much
its the good thing about being a bad player that u can play a lot of crappy positions and still have fun.

I however enjoyed the game, I mean u always look at the engine and the engine does not like it but I had a good time
because sometimes I win a game or lose it does not matter and I dont enjoy the game because I dont see anything new in the position, so thats about it.

So the theme is flexibility.

Attacking with a kingside majority.

A queenside majority is often considered more important than a kingside majority as a passed pawn on the queenside can become quite dangerous in the endgame. (Whereas on the kingside, there is usually one more defender against such a pawn - namely the king.)

In the middlegame however, there are cases where you can push your majority on the kingside, creating a massive space advantage and pushing your opponent's pieces backwards.
This is more or less what happened here: