@BlackBishop9319 said:
> well first of all, he didn't "come", he always existed.
From where do you know that? That is simply a claim you make, without an fact backing it.
> Outside of time too.
You denied exactly this when talking about the Big Bang. "Nothing can come out of nothing". It seems that someting can indeed come out of nothing if we only call that something "god" and make up silly stories about how he got into Marys panties. *)
> Second, man can't comprehend the nature of God
What?? You admit that your apparatus of comprehension is limited? And with this limited apparatus you have uncovered gods way of existing, namely his existence "out of time". You can't have it both ways: either your comprehension is limited or it isn't.
Either you lack the ability to understand gods nature because of this limitation - but then you just have to shut up and say "we don't know", like science does sometimes - which you took as an excuse to disregard its results wholesale in the first place. In this case your belief in god isn't even as good as science in explaining things because it explains less, not more.
Or your ability to comprehend is not limited - but then you say yourself that "god" wouldn't "really be god" anymore.
So, which way it is? The slings or the arrows of outrageous fortune?
krasnaya
_______________
*) corollary: here is a more realistic motivation for the new testament. A young woman is pregnant, nobody knows the father. Three old men come and bring precious gifts. Just follow the money.....