- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Did Andy get 3500 fairly?

Never could imagine for real - GM 2600 with possible great future is cheating in lichess's bullet

Never could imagine for real - GM 2600 with possible great future is cheating in lichess's bullet

I think he is Like a Player who only wants to push his elo. This isn't a bad thing. Other grandmasters maybe Play more for fun. Other grandmasters are maybe better than @mraquariyaz67 but He want to push his elo, more than other grandmasters.

I think he is Like a Player who only wants to push his elo. This isn't a bad thing. Other grandmasters maybe Play more for fun. Other grandmasters are maybe better than @mraquariyaz67 but He want to push his elo, more than other grandmasters.

he has litterally streamed himself why do this to him?

he has litterally streamed himself why do this to him?

@RakitinD said in #31:

Never could imagine for real - GM 2600 with possible great future is cheating in lichess's bullet

Jealous aintcha?

@RakitinD said in #31: > Never could imagine for real - GM 2600 with possible great future is cheating in lichess's bullet Jealous aintcha?

@AmeThyst27 said in #30:

We all know that @mraquariyaz67 (Andy Woodward) reached 3500. At first I was surprised, but after taking a deeper look I'm not sure if it's real. First of all, the "retired GM" offers draw in completely winning positions. He blunders queens in one move, blunders knights in one move. I need everyone's opinion if Andy reached 3500 bullet fairly.

No one knows, one popular telegram channel posted about a non-public ban on chess.com, he won Naroditsky 15-0 in a blitz match, he was the top 1 in the world by a margin of Magnus and Hikaru, no one can say whether he played fairly or not. But I can say that he played against 3200 very often, getting +2-+3 for winning, which is the familiar farming of a rating on players below the level of the game, these are not pure 3500, these are 3500 made mainly against the level of 3200. If lichess doesnt ban, then I think he deserved.
As for the loss of the queen and the draws, people can make mistakes, and even Magnus himself will never play perfectly.

When one is near the top of the TC's leaderboard one can't expect to find a lot of similarly rated opponents...you should know.

@AmeThyst27 said in #30: > > We all know that @mraquariyaz67 (Andy Woodward) reached 3500. At first I was surprised, but after taking a deeper look I'm not sure if it's real. First of all, the "retired GM" offers draw in completely winning positions. He blunders queens in one move, blunders knights in one move. I need everyone's opinion if Andy reached 3500 bullet fairly. > > No one knows, one popular telegram channel posted about a non-public ban on chess.com, he won Naroditsky 15-0 in a blitz match, he was the top 1 in the world by a margin of Magnus and Hikaru, no one can say whether he played fairly or not. But I can say that he played against 3200 very often, getting +2-+3 for winning, which is the familiar farming of a rating on players below the level of the game, these are not pure 3500, these are 3500 made mainly against the level of 3200. If lichess doesnt ban, then I think he deserved. > As for the loss of the queen and the draws, people can make mistakes, and even Magnus himself will never play perfectly. When one is near the top of the TC's leaderboard one can't expect to find a lot of similarly rated opponents...you should know.
<Comment deleted by user>

@mraquariyaz67 said in #2:

@Viyaan_d said in #1:

I'm pretty sure Magnus is 2800ish,does this mean andy's the best player

@mraquariyaz67 said in #2: @Viyaan_d said in #1: I'm pretty sure Magnus is 2800ish,does this mean andy's the best player
<Comment deleted by user>

@IamNOTamod said in #34:

Never could imagine for real - GM 2600 with possible great future is cheating in lichess's bullet

Jealous aintcha?

ага, держи в курсе, кхм

@IamNOTamod said in #34: > > Never could imagine for real - GM 2600 with possible great future is cheating in lichess's bullet > > Jealous aintcha? ага, держи в курсе, кхм

@EdwardChan6143Chess said in #37:

@Viyaan_d said in #1:

I'm pretty sure Magnus is 2800ish,does this mean andy's the best player

no hes almost 3300, and not necessarily. Maybe see if they've played eachother. Magnus might play more games against top rated opponents when the other guy plays against more randoms

@EdwardChan6143Chess said in #37: > > > @Viyaan_d said in #1: > > I'm pretty sure Magnus is 2800ish,does this mean andy's the best player no hes almost 3300, and not necessarily. Maybe see if they've played eachother. Magnus might play more games against top rated opponents when the other guy plays against more randoms