- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Did Andy get 3500 fairly?

#21

I think he got their fairly. Really incredible, especially for someone his age. I can only dream of playing as good as him.

I think he got their fairly. Really incredible, especially for someone his age. I can only dream of playing as good as him.
#22

if you care to know when I randomly looked at the live TV on the homepage, there were two 3000s/3100s and black missed a trivial rook ladder mate.

if you care to know when I randomly looked at the live TV on the homepage, there were two 3000s/3100s and black missed a trivial rook ladder mate.
#23

@Cedur216 said in #22:

if you care to know when I randomly looked at the live TV on the homepage, there were two 3000s/3100s and black missed a trivial rook ladder mate.

Then again, everything is clear in hindsight.

@Cedur216 said in #22: > if you care to know when I randomly looked at the live TV on the homepage, there were two 3000s/3100s and black missed a trivial rook ladder mate. Then again, everything is clear in hindsight.
#24

Deserved 3500. He worked for it.

Deserved 3500. He worked for it.
#25

@IamNOTamod said in #23:

if you care to know when I randomly looked at the live TV on the homepage, there were two 3000s/3100s and black missed a trivial rook ladder mate.

Then again, everything is clear in hindsight.

I saw that live and was like "what, that was mate, wasn't it?" so, not too much of hindsight ...

@IamNOTamod said in #23: > > if you care to know when I randomly looked at the live TV on the homepage, there were two 3000s/3100s and black missed a trivial rook ladder mate. > > Then again, everything is clear in hindsight. I saw that live and was like "what, that was mate, wasn't it?" so, not too much of hindsight ...
#26

@Blindus1231 said in #16:

I think Andy earned it honestly; he also has a stratospheric rating on chess.com... what I don't like are the extensive adoptions and milking the same cow nonstop. It's a shame pawn2queen4checkmate wasn't around to see a legendary match between these two beasts.

pawn2queen4checkmate was probably andy

I had heard that the account belonged to Samuel Sevian, he is also quite good at short time formats.

@Blindus1231 said in #16: > > I think Andy earned it honestly; he also has a stratospheric rating on chess.com... what I don't like are the extensive adoptions and milking the same cow nonstop. It's a shame pawn2queen4checkmate wasn't around to see a legendary match between these two beasts. > > pawn2queen4checkmate was probably andy I had heard that the account belonged to Samuel Sevian, he is also quite good at short time formats.
#27

@Shpittsik said in #26:

I think Andy earned it honestly; he also has a stratospheric rating on chess.com... what I don't like are the extensive adoptions and milking the same cow nonstop. It's a shame pawn2queen4checkmate wasn't around to see a legendary match between these two beasts.

pawn2queen4checkmate was probably andy

I had heard that the account belonged to Samuel Sevian, he is also quite good at short time formats.

Im sorry to tell you but thats just completely BS

@Shpittsik said in #26: > > > I think Andy earned it honestly; he also has a stratospheric rating on chess.com... what I don't like are the extensive adoptions and milking the same cow nonstop. It's a shame pawn2queen4checkmate wasn't around to see a legendary match between these two beasts. > > > > pawn2queen4checkmate was probably andy > > I had heard that the account belonged to Samuel Sevian, he is also quite good at short time formats. Im sorry to tell you but thats just completely BS
#29

Andy is the best, not because best rating but because 67

Andy is the best, not because best rating but because 67
#30

@Viyaan_d said in #1:

We all know that @mraquariyaz67 (Andy Woodward) reached 3500. At first I was surprised, but after taking a deeper look I'm not sure if it's real. First of all, the "retired GM" offers draw in completely winning positions. He blunders queens in one move, blunders knights in one move. I need everyone's opinion if Andy reached 3500 bullet fairly.

No one knows, one popular telegram channel posted about a non-public ban on chess.com, he won Naroditsky 15-0 in a blitz match, he was the top 1 in the world by a margin of Magnus and Hikaru, no one can say whether he played fairly or not. But I can say that he played against 3200 very often, getting +2-+3 for winning, which is the familiar farming of a rating on players below the level of the game, these are not pure 3500, these are 3500 made mainly against the level of 3200. If lichess doesnt ban, then I think he deserved.
As for the loss of the queen and the draws, people can make mistakes, and even Magnus himself will never play perfectly.

@Viyaan_d said in #1: > We all know that @mraquariyaz67 (Andy Woodward) reached 3500. At first I was surprised, but after taking a deeper look I'm not sure if it's real. First of all, the "retired GM" offers draw in completely winning positions. He blunders queens in one move, blunders knights in one move. I need everyone's opinion if Andy reached 3500 bullet fairly. No one knows, one popular telegram channel posted about a non-public ban on chess.com, he won Naroditsky 15-0 in a blitz match, he was the top 1 in the world by a margin of Magnus and Hikaru, no one can say whether he played fairly or not. But I can say that he played against 3200 very often, getting +2-+3 for winning, which is the familiar farming of a rating on players below the level of the game, these are not pure 3500, these are 3500 made mainly against the level of 3200. If lichess doesnt ban, then I think he deserved. As for the loss of the queen and the draws, people can make mistakes, and even Magnus himself will never play perfectly.