It's pointless from andy reaching 3500 to trashing abt chess skills here...
@AmeThyst27 said in #60:
> pointless argument
Something I agree with...
why did he get taken off leaderboard
he didn't, he isn't active in that format, so you'll be off leaderboard in a week or so if you never played that format...
@Aronyak64 said in #64:
> he didn't, he isn't active in that format, so you'll be off leaderboard in a week or so if you never played that format...
yeah
ok cool
wait,amythest closed his account?!!
@AmeThyst27 said in #30:
> > We all know that @mraquariyaz67 (Andy Woodward) reached 3500. At first I was surprised, but after taking a deeper look I'm not sure if it's real. First of all, the "retired GM" offers draw in completely winning positions. He blunders queens in one move, blunders knights in one move. I need everyone's opinion if Andy reached 3500 bullet fairly.
>
> No one knows, one popular telegram channel posted about a non-public ban on chess.com, he won Naroditsky 15-0 in a blitz match, he was the top 1 in the world by a margin of Magnus and Hikaru, no one can say whether he played fairly or not. But I can say that he played against 3200 very often, getting +2-+3 for winning, which is the familiar farming of a rating on players below the level of the game, these are not pure 3500, these are 3500 made mainly against the level of 3200. If lichess doesnt ban, then I think he deserved.
> As for the loss of the queen and the draws, people can make mistakes, and even Magnus himself will never play perfectly.
Your account is closed yourself dude
Nah, it’s like his 4th or 5th time doing this, maybe he’s studying or smth, he’s around 15 yrs of age..
i Dont think he got 3500 fairly the other guy was offering draws that in completely winning and lost on time with 2 seconds remaining like u should be able to checkmate when the king is cornered with 2 seconds u can even premove it and the mutual draws were just sus