Chess.com calling lichess the little site.

I agree lichess.org is better. You said nothing wrong.

Probably it's never advisable to say to your authorities things like: "We might lose the war."

(even if it's true)

lol another fact, if you speak about lichess in chess.com forum you can be banned !

It's a shame that we can't share our lichess stories with our Chess.com buddies.

Honestly, on the many occasions where I say positive things about Chess Tempo and other sites in these forums, very little is said in response. People in general seem not to grasp that different sites are good at different things.

I may have to check out Chess tempo @Toadofsky . Never heard of it. I actually came here many years ago from chesscube. They are still using adobe flash . Will check out the tempo site now.

Chess tempo kind of reminds me of FICS interface.

The "fact" that lichess or chess.com is better isn't a fact. It's an opinion. People here obviously think lichess is better, while people at chess.com think chess.com is better. It all depends on your points of view.

Well,if chess.com calls lichess a small site,then players on chess.com doesn't even know how lichess good is.They think lichess is worse even though some players never went to try to play in lichess.

@Radioactive7 there still are things that can be measured objectively:

• site performance
• amount of bugs
• features
• number of players of a certain rating range (more important for stronger players)
• costs

etc.