Can't create game with specific side any more

This really is one of the funniest threads ever

@BeDecentForAChange said in #631:

Please share the calculation in stead of your usual baseless claims

I can see how you would feel that writing in a thread and knowing about the subject is indeed suspicous given the comments you're putting out there

I understand you feel the need to do this. As soon as you realised how little sense it made, you removed the comment. But even NotTakeUsername saw it, and again you were made fun of for writing nonsense yet again

Yes you did

no worries, we remember

Wow, that's a fantastic conclusion

Nope it is an upgrade for fair play! nobody can be forced to paly abusers anymore!

Wrong again. As was explained to you, you were made fun of for calling the Lichess upgrade racist. I then called your calling it racist transopobic, and your comment on that lactose-intolerant.

Sure I do, but you choose to write long, non-nonsensical sentences that barely make sense. It's hard to explain to someone like that complex concepts

Doesnt matter. And now, lets read his reply, starting with "Wrong...." ).

Yes, you're wrong most of the time. Sorry for having to point it out

You’ve untangled the spaghetti of confusion with surgical precision.

I bow to you sir

The above post #635 of BeDecentForAChange - that reads like BeDecentForAChange thinks he is logged into an other account to compliment himself (quoting himself and write "I bow to you sir") - just that he was writing this with his BeDecentForAChange account. anyone wants to comment?

I copy #631 to make sure it wont be deleted:

@BeDecentForAChange said in #635:

Please share the calculation in stead of your usual baseless claims

I can see how you would feel that writing in a thread and knowing about the subject is indeed suspicous given the comments you're putting out there

I understand you feel the need to do this. As soon as you realised how little sense it made, you removed the comment. But even NotTakeUsername saw it, and again you were made fun of for writing nonsense yet again

Yes you did

no worries, we remember

Wow, that's a fantastic conclusion

Nope it is an upgrade for fair play! nobody can be forced to paly abusers anymore!

Wrong again. As was explained to you, you were made fun of for calling the Lichess upgrade racist. I then called your calling it racist transopobic, and your comment on that lactose-intolerant.

Sure I do, but you choose to write long, non-nonsensical sentences that barely make sense. It's hard to explain to someone like that complex concepts

Doesnt matter. And now, lets read his reply, starting with "Wrong...." ).

Yes, you're wrong most of the time. Sorry for having to point it out

@BeDecentForAChange said in #635:

You’ve untangled the spaghetti of confusion with surgical precision.

I bow to you sir

quoting BeDecentForAchange does not reflect/capture that he is quoting himself, addresses himself in 3rd person, tells himself he is bowing to him, addressing himself as sir

@BeDecentForAChange said in #635:

You’ve untangled the spaghetti of confusion with surgical precision.

I bow to you sir

Thank you for the compliment sir, shall we have a game some day?

@Munich said in #635:

quoting BeDecentForAchange does not reflect/capture that he is quoting himself, addresses himself in 3rd person, tells himself he is bowing to him, addressing himself as sir

You get that he's just messing with you, right?

You come up with a theory about his other accounts, and the next message he suddenly, accidentally makes a public compliment to himself in the 3rd person.. He's poking fun at you, don't bite

@Jseijp said in #637:

You get that he's just messing with you, right?

You come up with a theory about his other accounts, and the next message he suddenly, accidentally makes a public compliment to himself in the 3rd person.. He's poking fun at you, don't bite

Must you ruin it for me ?

Ah, I dont know. There is this "KISS" rule: keep it simple stupid.
By the way, some different user used the expression "I bow to you" (addressing BeDecent) before. However, more than 600 contributions make it cumbersome to search for it.

Hi.
So it is suppose that because people choose white almost all the time then Lichess disable that posibility?

Can somebody explain to me what is the problem?
I mean, if i choose "random"... i dont complain about what i get. If it is all the time black... i mean, i select random, so... why complain? If you want to play with white... choose white, oh! you wait more time because nobody is playing with black... so? you choose white, so wait, what is the problem here? if you dont get pair and still want to play, choose the other color.

But, anyway, in case that it is no posibility to maintain that way...
There is no better approach?
I mean, lichess cant propose a better approach that disable the posibility that exist from the beginning of times?

Why no that if you choose white, then you can choose just 10 games at maximum with white and then you are obligated if want to choose color to play with black for 10 times.... i mean, at least in that manner you will have people playing with black and dont delete a some kind logical option.

I dont speak english....