I have played online for 18 years on various servers and I have noticed the following, here on lichess in particular.
Ok, we have discussed about this inflation thingy every once in a while. So some further observations, this will disenchant some internet-only fellows with a high probability.
-longer time periods are practically non-existent
-the main focus is on playing fast. Not mediocre and fast, sometimes outright really bad chess, even if there’s plenty of time left for a spark of quality
-no opening theory, coffeehouse free-style, in other words: bad
-there’s often hardly any substance which could indicate some culture, having read some classics or similar stuff
-it seems that some guys learn and play by ear, as long it is fast it is good enough
-I often face or watch chess players who seem to have a standard of play 500 points below a comparable otb rating
-it might work on the internet but prepare to fail miserably reaching an equivalent rating in RL
Apparently this doesn’t apply to experienced and strong players >2400, the real meat. Or players who had gathered a large otb experience before. They usually play decent chess, some really swift and versed, exactly how it is supposed to be. Somehow the numbers „feel“ more reliable compared to otb. They show that you can play fast as well as maintaining a high level.
Don’t get me wrong, internet chess is fun, it‘s training, it is a supplement for offline encounters, but watch out if you play otb. It‘s is a different world, all this online tricks / mouse skills won’t work. The ratings correlate weakly but there are many outliers (in one direction in particular).
Good luck and happy checkmating!
Ok, we have discussed about this inflation thingy every once in a while. So some further observations, this will disenchant some internet-only fellows with a high probability.
-longer time periods are practically non-existent
-the main focus is on playing fast. Not mediocre and fast, sometimes outright really bad chess, even if there’s plenty of time left for a spark of quality
-no opening theory, coffeehouse free-style, in other words: bad
-there’s often hardly any substance which could indicate some culture, having read some classics or similar stuff
-it seems that some guys learn and play by ear, as long it is fast it is good enough
-I often face or watch chess players who seem to have a standard of play 500 points below a comparable otb rating
-it might work on the internet but prepare to fail miserably reaching an equivalent rating in RL
Apparently this doesn’t apply to experienced and strong players >2400, the real meat. Or players who had gathered a large otb experience before. They usually play decent chess, some really swift and versed, exactly how it is supposed to be. Somehow the numbers „feel“ more reliable compared to otb. They show that you can play fast as well as maintaining a high level.
Don’t get me wrong, internet chess is fun, it‘s training, it is a supplement for offline encounters, but watch out if you play otb. It‘s is a different world, all this online tricks / mouse skills won’t work. The ratings correlate weakly but there are many outliers (in one direction in particular).
Good luck and happy checkmating!