I think he means an option for those who WANT to... So it's a mutual agreement. A own game/option for a game. Those who don't play a normal game and bugger off when you gotta.
Forcing a rematch is a silly idea... people should have a choice on how many games they want to spend with a particular person.
NOT FORCED...an option both have to choose. It's an own game and YOU don't have to play it, my friend.
The reason why this is not a feature is because everyone can agree to 1 game but some would say best of 3 some 5 and you want 2 games. There would not be enough players using that feature for the amount of work to add that into the site.
i don't like rematches... one or the other person has a grudge already...............i'm a serial player.... sort of sad, really.... i got tons of games here (ok, only a couple hundred, maybe) but no idea who those guys were.........strangers in the night.
What do you base that conclusion on @Lidraughtsorg ?
The thing I find really disrespectful is people beating me.
One reason I don't play rematches is I like to see the analysis board straight after the game.
@piscatorox you don't find many people disrespecting you then
@drUnkmOnkOffEr I saw a post about it in the github awhile back I was trying to relay what I remember reading.
I understand it would be fewer and alot of work but I think you have to put the idea out there more than once to maybe get those who believe in it in the end and prove the scepsis wrong. @Lidraughtsorg Like any other new innvention or business idea.
We espescially saw in the Magnus Invitational that you really need to play black and white as many times to get a fair result. How much white has an advantage. Probably even more in fast games online. Without making any major comparison I think many under their league would like it too. But, hey, that's mostly based on a human need for fairness and redemption... ;)
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.