- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

list of cheaters

#192

"ELO3000", what the hell was that supposed to mean

Talk about false advertising :D

"ELO3000", what the hell was that supposed to mean Talk about false advertising :D
#194

I guess it's possible, for a game of that time limit. He played the middle-game very well, except I do disagree on one thing.

11.Bd3 was probably better than 11.Nxd5. Attacking the h7 pawn immediately gets your piece out of the way of the c file so that White can gain even more initiative by moving the knight from c3 to e4,
adding to the King's side attack while freeing up another attack by the Queen, instead of exchanging both knights and restoring Black's center pawn.

One more questionable thing is 26.Qc8. That doesn't even attack anything...even if Black leaves his King at g8, there is no attack or win for White's bishop with any of the discovered checks. A more
relaxing endgame for White could have been reached with 26.Qd7 Qxd7 27.Bxd7.

Then again, this might not mean anything, but I did play that guy before. His opening methods and susceptibility were very different in this game I played him.
http://en.lichess.org/analyse/r8nlyt7i/black

so idk, maybe he did cheat somehow

I know it's not my call sorry, just felt like analyzing.

I guess it's possible, for a game of that time limit. He played the middle-game very well, except I do disagree on one thing. 11.Bd3 was probably better than 11.Nxd5. Attacking the h7 pawn immediately gets your piece out of the way of the c file so that White can gain even more initiative by moving the knight from c3 to e4, adding to the King's side attack while freeing up another attack by the Queen, instead of exchanging both knights and restoring Black's center pawn. One more questionable thing is 26.Qc8. That doesn't even attack anything...even if Black leaves his King at g8, there is no attack or win for White's bishop with any of the discovered checks. A more relaxing endgame for White could have been reached with 26.Qd7 Qxd7 27.Bxd7. Then again, this might not mean anything, but I did play that guy before. His opening methods and susceptibility were very different in this game I played him. http://en.lichess.org/analyse/r8nlyt7i/black so idk, maybe he did cheat somehow I know it's not my call sorry, just felt like analyzing.
#195

Well right at this point I can tell you are right.
I need to analyze some more games with Rybka.

Well right at this point I can tell you are right. I need to analyze some more games with Rybka.
#196

Yeah turns out actually it looks like that game was played perfectly. (My 11.Bd3 suggestion was an equal, transposing alternative to 11.Nxd5 but not strictly better.)

Got to wonder how long he's been playing games like that though, cause I calmly had my game with him at Feb 1, 9 days ago.

Yeah turns out actually it looks like that game was played perfectly. (My 11.Bd3 suggestion was an equal, transposing alternative to 11.Nxd5 but not strictly better.) Got to wonder how long he's been playing games like that though, cause I calmly had my game with him at Feb 1, 9 days ago.
#197

abc and karakaj played several games with each other.
They both won their fair share...

Our algorithm only picked up cheating in most of abcs games (where he won) but none where he lost.

In this game mentioned he did make no mistakes...
In some of the others that were picked up by algorithm he made a few minor mistakes... Its fairly possible he uses a weaker engine something thats more available like ChessTitans (which isnt that
strong).

His move times are very slow in those games.

Hes reset.

abc and karakaj played several games with each other. They both won their fair share... Our algorithm only picked up cheating in most of abcs games (where he won) but none where he lost. In this game mentioned he did make no mistakes... In some of the others that were picked up by algorithm he made a few minor mistakes... Its fairly possible he uses a weaker engine something thats more available like ChessTitans (which isnt that strong). His move times are very slow in those games. Hes reset.
#198

Kind of like that andehss guy, then, except he appeared even less consistent and used a faster, better engine.

Chess Titans is Microshit. It takes like an hour of waiting to complete a King-and-rook-against-King endgame against the max level, even if I had several opportunities tens of moves ago to mate
earlier.

I can just imagine cheaters in basic rook-against-King endgames, taking thirty seconds every move lolololol

Kind of like that andehss guy, then, except he appeared even less consistent and used a faster, better engine. Chess Titans is Microshit. It takes like an hour of waiting to complete a King-and-rook-against-King endgame against the max level, even if I had several opportunities tens of moves ago to mate earlier. I can just imagine cheaters in basic rook-against-King endgames, taking thirty seconds every move lolololol
#200

I think this person was cheating. It makes no sense for them to cheat as it was a Casual game.

the nick is Saloman

http://en.lichess.org/a2hj97f5

Thank you

I think this person was cheating. It makes no sense for them to cheat as it was a Casual game. the nick is Saloman http://en.lichess.org/a2hj97f5 Thank you

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.