#10 I can almost guarantee that SF provides (and always provided) the same evaluation for those two moves. I suppose it's possible that SF evaluations for those two moves differed, in which case the problem generator wouldn't have a bug.
#1 Stockfish documentation mentions nothing about inaccuracies, mistakes, or blunders:
http://support.stockfishchess.org/discussions/questions/6-stockfish-engine-api-documentation
Hello flying toad. What do you mean ? I understand two opposite sentences.
#12 What do you mean what do I mean, and why do you believe I am flying?
As #1 explains, it seems wrong that "8.h7xg8Q+ is worse than 8.h7xg8R+". So in one or more of these places, there is a flaw:
* in Stockfish
* in the problem generator
* in using Stockfish with the problem generator
In #11 I suggest that Stockfish, which is thoroughly tested, is probably not defective (contrary to #1 suggesting that SF is "reporting an inaccuracy" whatever that means; likely he's attempting to say that the training module is reporting that 8.h7xg8Q+ is an inaccuracy):
http://tests.stockfishchess.org/tests
If you have questions, please be more specific as I have no idea what you are talking about.
i believe the flying comment is related to your username, which could be "toad of sky". :p
It is Toad of sky, right?
#14 Ah, of course. Thanks for casting light on that issue. :p
http://www.mariowiki.com/Toadofsky
We're honoured to be playing on this site with one of history's great composers.
I'm never calling you anything but "Toad of the sky" ever again.
Stockfish is right 100%!! Why would you clone your queen if she's going to be captured by the enemy king next move?! Have you no dignity?!!! ... sacrifice a rook. who care's about them :-)
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.