- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Hans Niemann Body Language Analysis

@kassanen said in #10:

A body language expert
A transgender that wants to compete in the women's chess section
An ex-casino employee or whatever this guy is

oh boy it gets better and better

We can do without your transphobic remarks, thank you.

@kassanen said in #10: > A body language expert > A transgender that wants to compete in the women's chess section > An ex-casino employee or whatever this guy is > > oh boy it gets better and better We can do without your transphobic remarks, thank you.

@esmiro said in #11:

We can do without your transphobic remarks, thank you.

how come my remark was transphobic?
i just refer to what the following post says
https://www.chesstech.org/2022/can-yosha-compete-as-a-woman/
which in my opinion this is another form of cheating

@esmiro said in #11: > We can do without your transphobic remarks, thank you. how come my remark was transphobic? i just refer to what the following post says https://www.chesstech.org/2022/can-yosha-compete-as-a-woman/ which in my opinion this is another form of cheating

@kassanen said in #12:

how come my remark was transphobic?
i just refer to what the following post says
www.chesstech.org/2022/can-yosha-compete-as-a-woman/
which in my opinion this is another form of cheating

The way you framed your post quite clearly suggests that her opinion should be dismissed in virtue of the fact that she is transgender, or at the very least that the fact of being transgender should raise suspicions about what she has to say about the cheating controversy.

And besides, she is a woman so of course she is going to demand to be admitted in women events, but that's off topic.

@kassanen said in #12: > how come my remark was transphobic? > i just refer to what the following post says > www.chesstech.org/2022/can-yosha-compete-as-a-woman/ > which in my opinion this is another form of cheating The way you framed your post quite clearly suggests that her opinion should be dismissed in virtue of the fact that she is transgender, or at the very least that the fact of being transgender should raise suspicions about what she has to say about the cheating controversy. And besides, she is a woman so of course she is going to demand to be admitted in women events, but that's off topic.

@esmiro said in #13:

The way you framed your post quite clearly suggests that her opinion should be dismissed in virtue of the fact that she is transgender, or at the very least that the fact of being transgender should raise suspicions about what she has to say about the cheating controversy.

And besides, she is a woman so of course she is going to demand to be admitted in women events, but that's off topic.

probably sth wrong with u cause either u dont want to understand what i wrote in my previous post or ur following a specific agenda

so again im saying that her opinion doesnt count so much cause she is a transgender who wants to compete as a woman in the chess world which imo is another hack

and she will never be a woman technically

@esmiro said in #13: > The way you framed your post quite clearly suggests that her opinion should be dismissed in virtue of the fact that she is transgender, or at the very least that the fact of being transgender should raise suspicions about what she has to say about the cheating controversy. > > And besides, she is a woman so of course she is going to demand to be admitted in women events, but that's off topic. probably sth wrong with u cause either u dont want to understand what i wrote in my previous post or ur following a specific agenda so again im saying that her opinion doesnt count so much cause she is a transgender who wants to compete as a woman in the chess world which imo is another hack and she will never be a woman technically

No one will convince me he's legit.

also

no one will convince the flat earthers the earth is round
no one will convince the anti vaxers that vaccines don't cause autism

you do you. have at it hoss. close your mind as tight as you want. no one is going to stop you

> No one will convince me he's legit. also no one will convince the flat earthers the earth is round no one will convince the anti vaxers that vaccines don't cause autism you do you. have at it hoss. close your mind as tight as you want. no one is going to stop you

@kassanen said in #14:

I understand there is an ongoing debate about transgender in sports. That is a different topic.

If your argument is ad hominem, then that's similar to Magnus asserting that Hans Niemann cheated in Sinquefield Cup because he did it before online. (though not as bad, because there is video evidence of Magnus himself cheating online)

@kassanen said in #14: > I understand there is an ongoing debate about transgender in sports. That is a different topic. If your argument is ad hominem, then that's similar to Magnus asserting that Hans Niemann cheated in Sinquefield Cup because he did it before online. (though not as bad, because there is video evidence of Magnus himself cheating online)

@kassanen said in #14:

probably sth wrong with u cause either u dont want to understand what i wrote in my previous post or ur following a specific agenda

so again im saying that her opinion doesnt count so much cause she is a transgender who wants to compete as a woman in the chess world which imo is another hack

and she will never be a woman technically

Oh I perfectly understood what you wrote (and repeated). It's easy to understand because the world is full of people like you. The fact that she is a trans woman logically implies that she'll demand to participate in women events, the two things are deeply connected. You'll hardly find a trans woman who just says "yeah, I'm ok with not belonging there". The fact that you think that her opinion (about a completely different issue, for the record) should be dismissed specifically because of this is very disturbing. It is a serious discrimination, and frankly it's hate speech.

@kassanen said in #14: > probably sth wrong with u cause either u dont want to understand what i wrote in my previous post or ur following a specific agenda > > so again im saying that her opinion doesnt count so much cause she is a transgender who wants to compete as a woman in the chess world which imo is another hack > > and she will never be a woman technically Oh I perfectly understood what you wrote (and repeated). It's easy to understand because the world is full of people like you. The fact that she is a trans woman logically implies that she'll demand to participate in women events, the two things are deeply connected. You'll hardly find a trans woman who just says "yeah, I'm ok with not belonging there". The fact that you think that her opinion (about a completely different issue, for the record) should be dismissed specifically because of this is very disturbing. It is a serious discrimination, and frankly it's hate speech.

@esmiro said in #17:

Oh I perfectly understood what you wrote (and repeated). It's easy to understand because the world is full of people like you. The fact that she is a trans woman logically implies that she'll demand to participate in women events, the two things are deeply connected. You'll hardly find a trans woman who just says "yeah, I'm ok with not belonging there". The fact that you think that her opinion (about a completely different issue, for the record) should be dismissed specifically because of this is very disturbing. It is a serious discrimination, and frankly it's hate speech.

As are Magnus' and chess.con popularisers assertions. Therefore I am not sure if he was doing it to illustrate how detestable Magnus' actions have been.

@esmiro said in #17: > Oh I perfectly understood what you wrote (and repeated). It's easy to understand because the world is full of people like you. The fact that she is a trans woman logically implies that she'll demand to participate in women events, the two things are deeply connected. You'll hardly find a trans woman who just says "yeah, I'm ok with not belonging there". The fact that you think that her opinion (about a completely different issue, for the record) should be dismissed specifically because of this is very disturbing. It is a serious discrimination, and frankly it's hate speech. As are Magnus' and chess.con popularisers assertions. Therefore I am not sure if he was doing it to illustrate how detestable Magnus' actions have been.

@esmiro said in #17:

Oh I perfectly understood what you wrote (and repeated). It's easy to understand because the world is full of people like you. The fact that she is a trans woman logically implies that she'll demand to participate in women events, the two things are deeply connected. You'll hardly find a trans woman who just says "yeah, I'm ok with not belonging there". The fact that you think that her opinion (about a completely different issue, for the record) should be dismissed specifically because of this is very disturbing. It is a serious discrimination, and frankly it's hate speech.

thank God the world is full of ppl like me and not like u Soros

@esmiro said in #17: > Oh I perfectly understood what you wrote (and repeated). It's easy to understand because the world is full of people like you. The fact that she is a trans woman logically implies that she'll demand to participate in women events, the two things are deeply connected. You'll hardly find a trans woman who just says "yeah, I'm ok with not belonging there". The fact that you think that her opinion (about a completely different issue, for the record) should be dismissed specifically because of this is very disturbing. It is a serious discrimination, and frankly it's hate speech. thank God the world is full of ppl like me and not like u Soros

@Nomoreusernames said in #18:

As are Magnus' and chess.con popularisers assertions. Therefore I am not sure if he was doing it to illustrate how detestable Magnus' actions have been.

What he was implying is quite clear, if you ever spent some time engaging with alt-right trolls. What he was saying is the following: "she's a transwoman" ---> "she's somehow disresputable" ---> "what she says doesn't matter".
In case we needed any more hints, he later called me "Soros", so it's obvious, at this point, where he's coming from. I won't engage any further with him because it's useless to do so.

@Nomoreusernames said in #18: > As are Magnus' and chess.con popularisers assertions. Therefore I am not sure if he was doing it to illustrate how detestable Magnus' actions have been. What he was implying is quite clear, if you ever spent some time engaging with alt-right trolls. What he was saying is the following: "she's a transwoman" ---> "she's somehow disresputable" ---> "what she says doesn't matter". In case we needed any more hints, he later called me "Soros", so it's obvious, at this point, where he's coming from. I won't engage any further with him because it's useless to do so.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.