Fritz best computer for analysis • page 2/2 • General Chess Discussion • lichess.org

@scuffi the point is about learning from it I meant analysis as a learning tool, an analogy you could use being a treckie fan is data and the borg, now the borg are tougher in every way than data who resembles a human but try asking the borg a question and you will get a stupid answer, well in the case of sf it is a hopelessly complicated answer for a human. Stop playing this America first at any cost nonsense and start supporting a usefull allies tool that helps a lot.

ProfDrHack

#12

Real pros analyze with Sargon.

Absolutely!

@ProfDrHack #12
Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I'm looking forward to finally have a chess analysing buddy at home.
Which Sargon version would you recommend me to purchase ?
Sargon II or Sargon V ? And what is the better platform to run it on ? VIC20 or Apple-II ? And should I add more RAM for faster processing ?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/be/Sargon_I_screenshot_%28notation%29.png/250px-Sargon_I_screenshot_%28notation%29.png

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Sargon_I_screenshot.png/220px-Sargon_I_screenshot.png

@ProfDrHack #12 Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I'm looking forward to finally have a chess analysing buddy at home. Which Sargon version would you recommend me to purchase ? Sargon II or Sargon V ? And what is the better platform to run it on ? VIC20 or Apple-II ? And should I add more RAM for faster processing ? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/b/be/Sargon_I_screenshot_%28notation%29.png/250px-Sargon_I_screenshot_%28notation%29.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Sargon_I_screenshot.png/220px-Sargon_I_screenshot.png

ProfDrHack edited

#15

@achja Newer versions or better hardware will only make the program play more artificial ...and who wants that, right? A little blunder here and there will almost make it feel like your buddy is a real human!
Thus you should try to aim at the lowest setting that is possible.

@achja Newer versions or better hardware will only make the program play more artificial ...and who wants that, right? A little blunder here and there will almost make it feel like your buddy is a real human! Thus you should try to aim at the lowest setting that is possible.

cap78red

#16

you haven't mentioned chessmaster 2000 on the amiga which i also had along with sargon ii chess on the vic 20 btw extra memory was impossible with sargon ii because it came in cartridge form and the extra memory was also a cartridge. one also assumes the screenshot was created by dual move input as the vic 20 sargon ii program had no book i am aware of and looked 1 to 2 plies ahead in my knowledge.
Seriously i think you are all cheats who have some kind of access to computer analysis in play otb and online in my opinion. Or you are all thick as the proverbial.

you haven't mentioned chessmaster 2000 on the amiga which i also had along with sargon ii chess on the vic 20 btw extra memory was impossible with sargon ii because it came in cartridge form and the extra memory was also a cartridge. one also assumes the screenshot was created by dual move input as the vic 20 sargon ii program had no book i am aware of and looked 1 to 2 plies ahead in my knowledge. Seriously i think you are all cheats who have some kind of access to computer analysis in play otb and online in my opinion. Or you are all thick as the proverbial.

zitterbart edited

#17

"Stop playing this America first at any cost nonsense(lol) and start supporting a usefull allies tool that helps a lot."

(lol) by me ... sounds like you have already made up your mind, so go ahead. Using Fritz instead of Stockfish (or using both) should not impact your measurable chess in any negative way.

"Stop playing this America first at any cost nonsense(lol) and start supporting a usefull allies tool that helps a lot." (lol) by me ... sounds like you have already made up your mind, so go ahead. Using Fritz instead of Stockfish (or using both) should not impact your measurable chess in any negative way.

datsjustforforuming

#18

no

to be a human like and this is what this is good for isnt a reason

check it out the human like analisation is not something positive

human like analisation is like a human can do so why would a human hire a computer for analising a game witch is analising a game like a human and the human could do it him/herself?

fritz whatever it plays grandmaster moves ofhtnen is not good

computer doesnt play human moves because computer and grandmster are not the same and the computers are better than grandmeses

so if u want a high quality game analisator forget human like.

humans are evil.

no to be a human like and this is what this is good for isnt a reason check it out the human like analisation is not something positive human like analisation is like a human can do so why would a human hire a computer for analising a game witch is analising a game like a human and the human could do it him/herself? fritz whatever it plays grandmaster moves ofhtnen is not good computer doesnt play human moves because computer and grandmster are not the same and the computers are better than grandmeses so if u want a high quality game analisator forget human like. humans are evil.