What are the differences between a 2000 rated player and a 2100 or a 2200 player, besides the rating? What do they have that 2000s don't? how can a 2000 get the traits of a 2200? Thanks
They have worked on whatever weaknesses they had. They either spread that out among the categories of skills, or they concentrated on getting much better at a few specific ones.
It can mean that they are just slower.
2100-2200 players are improved versions of 2000 players.
Note: I am talking about only rapid and classical.
In blitz they can find good moves quickly.
In bullet I don't know what's their difference. Bullet is not chess
Ultrabullet is totally out of the zone.
Even if it is not the topic that is being discussed, I have a problem with the page that I cannot solve, can someone help me?
Hello everyone, I wanted to ask if someone else happens to him that he cannot move pieces like the knight and the bishop on the queenside ...
It's just that it happens to me and so I can't play games because it doesn't let me move those pieces, the others move but those don't.
If someone can help you please write
All the best
@REVIENTACARRILES no, I think it's just you
This is another one of those topics which I call Imponderable Questions. You get them a lot around here, and they seem to have very little point. After all, if such things could be easily summarized, we would all be GMs (and in just a handful of easy steps!).
@TheKingClash said in #3:
> The 2000+ player ...
I'm surprised there is only one 2000+ player in the world.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.