- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Cheating problem

<Comment deleted by user>

Sadly.. I had the mind set of you, but fortunately had two people here a lot better than me, who to took the time to convince that the % cheating is very low... And that I was using possible cheating as an excuse to face the fact that I was not as good as I thought. That I had hard work to do .

And you are looking at the % accuracy wrong. If you play badly and the opponent plays moves that are easy to make his/her accuracy will be high. ... I only look at my accuracy % to judge how well my opponent played.

Sadly.. I had the mind set of you, but fortunately had two people here a lot better than me, who to took the time to convince that the % cheating is very low... And that I was using possible cheating as an excuse to face the fact that I was not as good as I thought. That I had hard work to do . And you are looking at the % accuracy wrong. If you play badly and the opponent plays moves that are easy to make his/her accuracy will be high. ... I only look at my accuracy % to judge how well my opponent played.

Just do some tactics and watch some YT videos on how to develop the pieces, like seriously...

Just do some tactics and watch some YT videos on how to develop the pieces, like seriously...

@bufferunderrun how many more of these threads do we need until accuracy is FINALLY REMOVED??

@bufferunderrun how many more of these threads do we need until accuracy is FINALLY REMOVED??

For example, in your latest game you blundered a knight on move 6 and lost a rook a few moves later.

https://lichess.org/bGFLqj0q/black#21

From then on, you were down so much material that only a huge blunder from white could turn the game around, so as far as the algorithm was concerned, BOTH of you played the rest of the game just about perfectly (since white's winning probability remained stable at 99.5% or whatever).

Forget about your opponent's 99% accuracy, YOUR accuracy of 91% was higher than my average accuracy in rapid (86.4%). Congratulations, you played more "accurately" than a 2600! Are you a cheater or a sandbagger? Asking for a friend who wants to report a player.

For example, in your latest game you blundered a knight on move 6 and lost a rook a few moves later. https://lichess.org/bGFLqj0q/black#21 From then on, you were down so much material that only a huge blunder from white could turn the game around, so as far as the algorithm was concerned, BOTH of you played the rest of the game just about perfectly (since white's winning probability remained stable at 99.5% or whatever). Forget about your opponent's 99% accuracy, YOUR accuracy of 91% was higher than my average accuracy in rapid (86.4%). Congratulations, you played more "accurately" than a 2600! Are you a cheater or a sandbagger? Asking for a friend who wants to report a player.

@PurpleInferno said in #5:

YOUR accuracy of 91% was higher than my average accuracy in rapid (86.4%
Can you please tell how did you know about your average accuracy?

@PurpleInferno said in #5: > YOUR accuracy of 91% was higher than my average accuracy in rapid (86.4% Can you please tell how did you know about your average accuracy?

@Cedur216 said in #4:

@bufferunderrun how many more of these threads do we need until accuracy is FINALLY REMOVED??

I think it has to be the same effort used to ask to add it to lichess

@Cedur216 said in #4: > @bufferunderrun how many more of these threads do we need until accuracy is FINALLY REMOVED?? I think it has to be the same effort used to ask to add it to lichess

@Bazigar_64squqres said in #6:

Can you please tell how did you know about your average accuracy?
It's in Chess Insights in your profile. See https://lichess.org/insights/Bazigar_64squqres/accuracy/variant for your own accuracy by variant.

@Bazigar_64squqres said in #6: > Can you please tell how did you know about your average accuracy? It's in Chess Insights in your profile. See https://lichess.org/insights/Bazigar_64squqres/accuracy/variant for your own accuracy by variant.

@PurpleInferno said in #8:

It's in Chess Insights in your profile. See lichess.org/insights/Bazigar_64squqres/accuracy/variant for your own accuracy by variant.
Thanks, Mine is 82.4%

@PurpleInferno said in #8: > It's in Chess Insights in your profile. See lichess.org/insights/Bazigar_64squqres/accuracy/variant for your own accuracy by variant. Thanks, Mine is 82.4%

@SergioGlorias said in #7:

I think it has to be the same effort used to ask to add it to lichess
A mod is here. Can you please close the forum as it has no meaning?

@SergioGlorias said in #7: > I think it has to be the same effort used to ask to add it to lichess A mod is here. Can you please close the forum as it has no meaning?

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.