Her protest is most illogical as far as I can tell.
She was paired off against 8 females and 2 males.
Her argument is that women can fair just as well at chess as men.
So she protests because she was paired up against too many women.
If women are just as good as men, then what difference should it make the gender of her opponent so long as they are of good strength?
And it's not like she wasn't given any strong male opponents. They gave her Micheal Adams, and she lost to him in 70 moves.
What was she hoping for? To get paired up against Naka, and Caruana, and Topalov instead of some of the girls she faced? If that were the case then she would have even more losses, and women would look even worse at chess.
I say they give her what she wants, and let her play in a round robin against some super GMs where she will likely get butchered, but who knows she may surprise everyone, and do great. My money is on her losing these ego points though if she has to face off against Magnus, and the rest at the top.
Her protest is most illogical as far as I can tell.
She was paired off against 8 females and 2 males.
Her argument is that women can fair just as well at chess as men.
So she protests because she was paired up against too many women.
If women are just as good as men, then what difference should it make the gender of her opponent so long as they are of good strength?
And it's not like she wasn't given any strong male opponents. They gave her Micheal Adams, and she lost to him in 70 moves.
What was she hoping for? To get paired up against Naka, and Caruana, and Topalov instead of some of the girls she faced? If that were the case then she would have even more losses, and women would look even worse at chess.
I say they give her what she wants, and let her play in a round robin against some super GMs where she will likely get butchered, but who knows she may surprise everyone, and do great. My money is on her losing these ego points though if she has to face off against Magnus, and the rest at the top.