You need toput it on game of da month
why does it say "the legend says spectators thre gold coins at the board" above the frank marshall game?
The self-promotion is a little much, in my view. Humility, please.
@iamtyler said in #22:
> why does it say "the legend says spectators thre gold coins at the board" above the frank marshall game?
Supposed to say "the legend says spectators thre'w' gold coins at the board"
Great game!
@CkickyCheck Absolute mind mind blowing game! When I saw your game, I saw Re1, but I felt like your move, Re3 was way better. Re3 reminded me of Shakhriyar Mamedyarov's game, where he sacrificed his 2 rooks on the same exact square: the e3 square.
P.S: I saw the game in a GothamChess short!
@Cedur216 said in #17:
> Marshall's move is the most overrated BS in history. It doesn't win him the game (as he was already winning), the whole thing is neither deep nor forced, it's not even original. There are hundreds of incredible moves in chess history and this is absolutely NOT one of them.
It is nevertheless super hard to see such an "invisible'' move where it can be captured by three different pieces. I do not understand how such a move can be hated.
I don't hate the move, I just hate its preposterous glorification