- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

ACWC Info

I think 5+3 would be a very nice time control for the ACWC.

I think 5+3 would be a very nice time control for the ACWC.

ok so @finlip I agree I'd also like a similar time control but I tried to find a compromise, since many players would not play such long time controls
@Hastinsson maybe a faster tournament (30 sec + 1?) can be done between elite players and the winner of this WC could challenge the winner of that event in a match with an average time control. That would be a nice idea, but for now I'd keep focusing on this since it's not that easy to organize such events and requires quite some time. If someone other organized a fast event I'd be happy.

ok so @finlip I agree I'd also like a similar time control but I tried to find a compromise, since many players would not play such long time controls @Hastinsson maybe a faster tournament (30 sec + 1?) can be done between elite players and the winner of this WC could challenge the winner of that event in a match with an average time control. That would be a nice idea, but for now I'd keep focusing on this since it's not that easy to organize such events and requires quite some time. If someone other organized a fast event I'd be happy.

more then 2+0 will be ez for players to use engines, and yes there is a lot of them who use engines. so if u wanna a clear and fair play make it 2+0 or more fast

more then 2+0 will be ez for players to use engines, and yes there is a lot of them who use engines. so if u wanna a clear and fair play make it 2+0 or more fast

im sure then more the 50% will like this fast tc u have to think in all parts

im sure then more the 50% will like this fast tc u have to think in all parts

@AlushTarabein The ACWC is going to be heavily moderated so players who use engines will most likely be banned very quickly.

@AlushTarabein The ACWC is going to be heavily moderated so players who use engines will most likely be banned very quickly.

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.