Search "user:coderunner86"

Ah, that makes total sense and I agree with you. And I also would prefer my phone for real use. Just happened to be on my laptop when I stumbled on your blog post :)

Hi pierremarc, I think you had a great idea and hit on something that many players would appreciate or want (without knowing it) - the ability to train on the board without needing a human partner and…

Ok, my curiosity has been satisfied. I may ask again in a couple of years :)

I agree with everything you wrote and I am not holding my breath to see actual, useful implementations of anything browser-related for a long while. But since the API exists it is conceivable that sev…

This is obviously a developer question, so it would be understandable if nobody knowledgeable is around : I am aware that standard APIs like WebNN already exist, but I doubt that they are available / …

One thing I've noticed is that chess.com is, compared to lichess.com, extremely power hungry. If you're playing on battery then, everything else being equal (which, of course it is not!) lichess.com i…

I see - a bit puzzled (ahem) though that this would make such a big difference. But then again my puzzle rating went up by 300 pts when I decided to quit doing easier (-300) puzzles and settled on nor…

@lonelypeanut said in #3: > I lost 300 points for example after switching my approach to never put in a move before I'm not sure of the full solution. > > All that said 2050 is not bad. How would that…

Probably a newbie question. Are they looking for cheap thrill? Or an easy way to improve their rating by 1 or 2 points? I decline, because what is there to gain by an assured loss?

@DTCHESSY I will take you up on that at some point! What time zone are you in? @ThunderClap obviously, as chess is concerned, you are living in a different universe from me. But I would assume that ou…