why you shouldnt play 1900's

interesting post. (not really)

just REPORT

You won

I don't understand the point. Is it the bad played by the 1900? ... the bad moves played by you?... the bad sportsmanship displayed by both players?

Play 1800s instead ☺️

Don't get the message, explain @Darksouls

Humilating others or humilating yourself with bad style?

Guess I should just skip and play 2000's :(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((()

@sargon look at the move times, and i didn't humiliate anyone, opponent refused to move so i posted the game as i gave them time over and over again and posted the thread as the game was playing i let it go on for over 15 minutes ... well i got a good laugh out of it, my intent in the game was clear ... I do not respect people that don't move and run the clock, either move or resign.. I know sargon im not a good player, look at the rating.

So you humiliated your opponent in the game by not checkmating on Move 32 (or earlier), and now you're trying to humiliate him/her in the forum. Very classy (not)!

bruh you underpromoted instead of checkmating, then they stall, you're both not good sports. If you don't want people to stall, you should also be a good sport and just checkmate.