Checkmate.
First he wants chaos, and when he gets it, he's crying...
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/chess-needs-more-chaos#1
lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/chess-needs-more-chaos#1
I'd say "beat them" but there was this one time that a few players came to the hotel looking really down. "We got beaten." "Was it that bad?" "No I mean some people actually did beat us up for real".
Don't beat your opponents. Not even if they're arrogant. It'll fall foul of Article 11.1 " The players shall take no action that will bring the game of chess into disrepute."
Just defeat them. Or challenge them to chessboxing if you want to legitimately beat them.
Don't beat your opponents. Not even if they're arrogant. It'll fall foul of Article 11.1 " The players shall take no action that will bring the game of chess into disrepute."
Just defeat them. Or challenge them to chessboxing if you want to legitimately beat them.
... (lots of deleted crap)
> - Only then promote all pawns to rooks (not queens to avoid stalemate)
> - IMPORTANT: Do not let them run out of time. Keep perssing that "add time" button
> - Make an art with your remaining pieces. For example:
> ------- With 5 Rooks lichess.org/editor/8/3R4/2R5/KR2k3/2R5/3R4/8/8_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- With 6 Rooks and 1 Queen lichess.org/editor/K7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/Q6k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- Or combinations. Be creative! lichess.org/editor/K7/1B6/5R2/4Q3/3Q4/2R5/8/7k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> - Checkmate at last 2 second
Wow, this is one of the most obnoxious and arrogant posts I've seen here. If I could down vote it more than once I definitely would.
You do this crap at your own peril (and you can certainly stalemate someone without any queens). I was watching one of Hanging Pawns's videos recently. He was pissed that an opponent wasn't resigning in a position that was K+Q+2 or 3 pawns vs K. I remember it well - he says "well, he's not resigning so I'm going to make 3 queens. I don't care, I won't stalemate him." Then 2 moves later...stalemate. I definitely laughed out loud when I saw that. Was it worth it...
> - Only then promote all pawns to rooks (not queens to avoid stalemate)
> - IMPORTANT: Do not let them run out of time. Keep perssing that "add time" button
> - Make an art with your remaining pieces. For example:
> ------- With 5 Rooks lichess.org/editor/8/3R4/2R5/KR2k3/2R5/3R4/8/8_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- With 6 Rooks and 1 Queen lichess.org/editor/K7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/Q6k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- Or combinations. Be creative! lichess.org/editor/K7/1B6/5R2/4Q3/3Q4/2R5/8/7k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> - Checkmate at last 2 second
Wow, this is one of the most obnoxious and arrogant posts I've seen here. If I could down vote it more than once I definitely would.
You do this crap at your own peril (and you can certainly stalemate someone without any queens). I was watching one of Hanging Pawns's videos recently. He was pissed that an opponent wasn't resigning in a position that was K+Q+2 or 3 pawns vs K. I remember it well - he says "well, he's not resigning so I'm going to make 3 queens. I don't care, I won't stalemate him." Then 2 moves later...stalemate. I definitely laughed out loud when I saw that. Was it worth it...
@borninthesixties said in #15:
> one of Hanging Pawns's videos recently. He was pissed that an opponent wasn't resigning in a position that was K+Q+2 or 3 pawns vs K. I remember it well - he says "well, he's not resigning so I'm going to make 3 queens. I don't care, I won't stalemate him." Then 2 moves later...stalemate. I definitely laughed out loud when I saw that. Was it worth it...
I'm tempted to say that such video might have much higher educative value than its author originally wanted. :-)
(Unless it was done on purpose, of course.)
> one of Hanging Pawns's videos recently. He was pissed that an opponent wasn't resigning in a position that was K+Q+2 or 3 pawns vs K. I remember it well - he says "well, he's not resigning so I'm going to make 3 queens. I don't care, I won't stalemate him." Then 2 moves later...stalemate. I definitely laughed out loud when I saw that. Was it worth it...
I'm tempted to say that such video might have much higher educative value than its author originally wanted. :-)
(Unless it was done on purpose, of course.)
this is wrong
@SNS48 said in #1:
> Arrogant players are those who usually do at least 3 of the below:
>
> - Hit and run (ask for lots of rematches and then run after 1 win)
> - Will not resign (Will only lose on time, checkmate, or abandonment)
> - Play fast and tryhard
> - Exchange everything after up 1 pawn
>
> My favorite way to deal with them:
>
> - First and foremost: Win the position and time
> - Only then promote all pawns to rooks (not queens to avoid stalemate)
> - IMPORTANT: Do not let them run out of time. Keep perssing that "add time" button
> - Make an art with your remaining pieces. For example:
> ------- With 5 Rooks lichess.org/editor/8/3R4/2R5/KR2k3/2R5/3R4/8/8_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- With 6 Rooks and 1 Queen lichess.org/editor/K7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/Q6k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- Or combinations. Be creative! lichess.org/editor/K7/1B6/5R2/4Q3/3Q4/2R5/8/7k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> - Checkmate at last 2 second
> - ALSO IMPORTANT: When they ask for a rematch, DO NOT DO ANYTHING. Don't go away, don't accept. This tactic is 100% effective to make them mad. If you want to go, at least wait for 30 second before leaving, therefore they will hope they can use their Hit and Run tactic before realizing their hope is futile.
I think you fit the criteria of arrogant players perfectly.
> Arrogant players are those who usually do at least 3 of the below:
>
> - Hit and run (ask for lots of rematches and then run after 1 win)
> - Will not resign (Will only lose on time, checkmate, or abandonment)
> - Play fast and tryhard
> - Exchange everything after up 1 pawn
>
> My favorite way to deal with them:
>
> - First and foremost: Win the position and time
> - Only then promote all pawns to rooks (not queens to avoid stalemate)
> - IMPORTANT: Do not let them run out of time. Keep perssing that "add time" button
> - Make an art with your remaining pieces. For example:
> ------- With 5 Rooks lichess.org/editor/8/3R4/2R5/KR2k3/2R5/3R4/8/8_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- With 6 Rooks and 1 Queen lichess.org/editor/K7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/R7/Q6k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> ------- Or combinations. Be creative! lichess.org/editor/K7/1B6/5R2/4Q3/3Q4/2R5/8/7k_w_HAha_-_0_1?color=white
> - Checkmate at last 2 second
> - ALSO IMPORTANT: When they ask for a rematch, DO NOT DO ANYTHING. Don't go away, don't accept. This tactic is 100% effective to make them mad. If you want to go, at least wait for 30 second before leaving, therefore they will hope they can use their Hit and Run tactic before realizing their hope is futile.
I think you fit the criteria of arrogant players perfectly.
So, arrogant people are people who suck less at chess than you? I guess the way you deal with them is either become more chill, or quit interacting with people.
rather than fighting fire with fire, I just win and quickly move on to the next game/game analysis so as to not give such players any more of my time
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.