- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

ACWC 2024 Pairings and Match results

@patrickrg said in #529:

Exactly. According to the rules V.A and V.G, you have to offer me 3 times or accept one of mines by Friday 23:59 UTC at the latest. If you fail to do so you must accept a time chosen by me.

I did not know about these rules. Ive been very busy these days.

I offered you a time for monday 15 UTC

@patrickrg said in #529: > Exactly. According to the rules V.A and V.G, you have to offer me 3 times or accept one of mines by Friday 23:59 UTC at the latest. If you fail to do so you must accept a time chosen by me. I did not know about these rules. Ive been very busy these days. I offered you a time for monday 15 UTC

@patrickrg we can go now or monday 15 utc as you suggested

@patrickrg we can go now or monday 15 utc as you suggested

I'm not the president so I think @bwmtone should make the final decision. If he tells patrick to play, then he will play and the problem will be solved

I'm not the president so I think @bwmtone should make the final decision. If he tells patrick to play, then he will play and the problem will be solved

I am not a TD for ACWC and I defer to @ODMWND and @TheUnknownGuyReborn, however, as I stated early on in this tournament, please make every effort to actually play your match. In the candidates stage we should not have technicality wins.

@patrickrg is correct in terms of the rules and @llIVIll should have responded quicker. However, I think this match should be played.

Just my opinion.

-tone

I am not a TD for ACWC and I defer to @ODMWND and @TheUnknownGuyReborn, however, as I stated early on in this tournament, please make every effort to actually play your match. In the candidates stage we should not have technicality wins. @patrickrg is correct in terms of the rules and @llIVIll should have responded quicker. However, I think this match should be played. Just my opinion. -tone

Hey, @patrickrg,

It's totally understandable that any player can have a busy agenda and may need to know in advance to plan ahead. What the rules state is that, by not having answered by Friday 23:59 UTC, @llIVIll has lost the right to propose times himself, and should stick to any of the ones you previously proposed.

But deciding unilaterally on a different fourth time slot, which is non compliant with the 3 hours separation rule, is most likely not correct.

I personally couldn't agree more with Tone, and would prefer you both to be gracious, forget the misunderstanding and play a competitive yet friendly match. :) But, of course, the decision is up to the tournament organizers.

Hey, @patrickrg, It's totally understandable that any player can have a busy agenda and may need to know in advance to plan ahead. What the rules state is that, by not having answered by Friday 23:59 UTC, @llIVIll has lost the right to propose times himself, and should stick to any of the ones you previously proposed. But deciding unilaterally on a different fourth time slot, which is non compliant with the 3 hours separation rule, is most likely not correct. I personally couldn't agree more with Tone, and would prefer you both to be gracious, forget the misunderstanding and play a competitive yet friendly match. :) But, of course, the decision is up to the tournament organizers.

@Agburanar said in #535:

Hey, @Patrick,

It's totally understandable that any player can have a busy agenda and may need to know in advance to plan ahead. What the rules state is that, by not having answered by Friday 23:59 UTC, @llIVIll has lost the right to propose times himself, and should stick to any of the ones you previously proposed.

But deciding unilaterally on a different fourth time slot, which is non compliant with the 3 hours separation rule, is most likely not correct.

I personally couldn't agree more with Tone, and would prefer you both to be gracious, forget the misunderstanding and play a competitive yet friendly match. :) But, of course, the decision is up to the tournament organizers.
You tagged the wrong patrick , what did he do ? . you shoud edit it or delete and repost it

@Agburanar said in #535: > Hey, @Patrick, > > It's totally understandable that any player can have a busy agenda and may need to know in advance to plan ahead. What the rules state is that, by not having answered by Friday 23:59 UTC, @llIVIll has lost the right to propose times himself, and should stick to any of the ones you previously proposed. > > But deciding unilaterally on a different fourth time slot, which is non compliant with the 3 hours separation rule, is most likely not correct. > > I personally couldn't agree more with Tone, and would prefer you both to be gracious, forget the misunderstanding and play a competitive yet friendly match. :) But, of course, the decision is up to the tournament organizers. You tagged the wrong patrick , what did he do ? . you shoud edit it or delete and repost it

@Siddiq1911 said in #536:

You tagged the wrong patrick , what did he do ? . you shoud edit it or delete and repost it

True, thanks for noticing, Siddiq. Edited.

@Siddiq1911 said in #536: > You tagged the wrong patrick , what did he do ? . you shoud edit it or delete and repost it True, thanks for noticing, Siddiq. Edited.

After a lot of consideration I decided that we will play the match. WhydoIplayhere, tone and agburanar are right, this is not the correct way of winning. But yesterday after seeing that I could claim a win I panicked and I couldn't resist the temptation of doing so. Now I feel that I shouldn't have done that because this tournament is to play antichess not for seeking technical difficulties, as tone said at the first round of the tournament.
With that being said, @patrickrg vs @llIVIll will take place Monday 15 UTC. Good luck and have fun! :)

After a lot of consideration I decided that we will play the match. WhydoIplayhere, tone and agburanar are right, this is not the correct way of winning. But yesterday after seeing that I could claim a win I panicked and I couldn't resist the temptation of doing so. Now I feel that I shouldn't have done that because this tournament is to play antichess not for seeking technical difficulties, as tone said at the first round of the tournament. With that being said, @patrickrg vs @llIVIll will take place Monday 15 UTC. Good luck and have fun! :)

Thank you. Goodluck.
And thanks to everyone who took the time to weigh in.

Thank you. Goodluck. And thanks to everyone who took the time to weigh in.

Patrick, that's very nice of you. I can feel not getting an answer as days passed by was stressful and frustrating, and claiming the win was a way to move on. But I'm glad you and llIVIll will finally play. Good luck to you both!

Patrick, that's very nice of you. I can feel not getting an answer as days passed by was stressful and frustrating, and claiming the win was a way to move on. But I'm glad you and llIVIll will finally play. Good luck to you both!

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.