Chess.com is poor
I think chess.com is more formal while lichess is casual. If you can pay you’ll get very good material on chess.com but if you are just a casual player lichess is better for you. You should not criticise chess.com like that just because they want money, have you ever seen a big tournament happening on lichess, no right they are all on chess.com, and that makes it difficult for them and they have to pay more so they want more, it depends of what kind of a player you are. I’ve seen chess.com premium content it is downright awesome and 500% better than lichess it just depends on wether you want to pay or not
Can't you just use the product you prefer without continuously having to seek approval from random other people???
This is about the 34th identical thread in 6 months.
lichess is the best, thibaut is the best, love you @thibault! #Lovethibaultandlichess
#42 elaborate? Ofc premium would be better than free, but most ppl dont want to pay so Lichess is better for most people.
I play on both Lichess and Chess.com. I know which one I prefer more. Lichess.
I like the search function the most and I wish others would use it too so we don' have the same boring topics over and over again
chess.com is better because there is option to see human photo, so that when I win I can see and imagine how sad they are with that face.
@angstg Was that a joke?
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.