Is true randomness real

@Human77 said in #39:

@Approximation
That is why the Scientists say they need more money

If money is approval for Scientists to do what they say they need... Is it worth it in your opinion, and if so to what extent? Governments can always print more money, giving approval for such projects (or ideas) figuring it out that way. It's probably better than having them work on nothing! The problem with printing money though as a solution to fund what Scientists say they need money for is that inflation is like a tax on the money supply, which everyone who uses money pays for - so, its a real tradeoff consideration.

@Approximation said in #41:

Is it worth it in your opinion
No.
It might be worth it if they had some worthwhile results to show for it.
When was the last time they had that in your opinion?

@Human77 said in #42:

No.
It might be worth it if they had some worthwhile results to show for it.
When was the last time they had that in your opinion?

How do you know what results are in the bill until you sign the bill funding it for the scientists to research?

Now, that's how politics work, after a little debate about it! ;-)

@Approximation
yes.
"Science" and Politics are all about convincing people that it is something worthwhile you are doing, while ignoring past failures or lack of results.
the blame game