Hamas is not using human shields as claimed

@ed01106 said in #50:
> Which part of the word ALL did you not understand.
I understood everything because I speak Arabic, but you don't because you don't speak Arabic. Simple.

And you know what I meant by "the whole world wants a ceasefire". The whole world except zionists want a ceasefire.

Until UN resolution 181 is respected by the Palestinians no subsequent resolution is particularly relevant.

Ceasefire is a more relevant option, you want to stop the genocide in Gaza?

Is it an option to not bring down Hamas if you want to stop terror and bloodshed on innocent Israelis?

(I know your attitude, I'm just highlighting your strawmen)

@WassimBerbar said in #51:
> I understood everything because I speak Arabic, but you don't because you don't speak Arabic. Simple.
>
> And you know what I meant by "the whole world wants a ceasefire". The whole world except zionists want a ceasefire.

LMAO calling Tunisia zionist

@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #55:
> LMAO calling Tunisia zionist
Zionist Arabs exist, non-muslim Arabs and non-Arab muslims also exist. There are traitors inside governments, you find out who they truly are just by seeing what they speak.

And Tunisia has abstained its choice like the other yellow countries, Tunisia hasn't made a decision.

@Cedur216 said in #54:
> Is it an option to not bring down Hamas if you want to stop terror and bloodshed on innocent Israelis?
Israel should have taken down Hamas already with their insane technologically advanced weapons. Why Israel didn't take down Hamas while Israel tell all over social media they are terrorists is beyond my comprehension.

@WassimBerbar said in #53:
> Ceasefire is a more relevant option, you want to stop the genocide in Gaza?

The most relevant option is the unconditional releasing of all the hostages.

But there is no genocide, if Israel wanted to commit than the death count would be tens of thousands per day.

But after over 75 years of the Palestians demanding complete genocide of Israelis maybe it is time for Israel to adopt a parallel policy

@ed01106 said in #57:
> The most relevant option is the unconditional releasing of all the hostages.
Hamas are releasing hostages, I didn't see any mainstream newspaper saying Israel released theirs. No hostage exchange, no surrendering of Hamas, the carnage is continuing.

> But there is no genocide, if Israel wanted to commit than the death count would be tens of thousands per day.
Tens of thousands per month is still a sign of genocide. Hamas are releasing hostages, I didn't see any newspaper saying Israel released theirs. No hostage exchange, no surrendering of Hamas, the carnage is continuing.

> But after over 75 years of the Palestians demanding complete genocide of Israelis maybe it is time for Israel to adopt a parallel policy
There's a name for the operation of ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, the "Nakba". Israel wants that land for r reason, but it's not with launching rockets on civilians that they will get their land.

@WassimBerbar said in #56:
> Zionist Arabs exist, non-muslim Arabs and non-Arab muslims also exist. There are traitors inside governments, you find out who they truly are just by seeing what they speak.

You didn't sat you shought only the no-votes were Zionist.

Why do you think Papua New Guinea are zionist?

Is it possible Papua New Guinea are not Zionist and voted aganst the resolution for some other reason relevant to Papua New Guinea politicians? Yes?

@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #59:
> You didn't sat you shought only the no-votes were Zionist.
>
> Why do you think Papua New Guinea are zionist?
>
> Is it possible Papua New Guinea are not Zionist and voted aganst the resolution for some other reason relevant to Papua New Guinea politicians? Yes?
I never said Papua New Guinea are zionists. I said they abstained their decisions as in the map they're colored in yellow, not they don't want a ceasefire (which is weird, it's obvious we want ceasefire to stop this massacre).