- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Policy on use of ChatGPT

#31

@dboing said in #30:

[...]

Thanks but I was hoping for "yes" or "no" as an answer.
The question is: is the "summary in bullet points" in #28 an accurate portrayal of what you were trying to say?

@dboing said in #30: > [...] Thanks but I was hoping for "yes" or "no" as an answer. The question is: is the "summary in bullet points" in #28 an accurate portrayal of what you were trying to say?
#32

@Brian-E said in #31:

Thanks but I was hoping for "yes" or "no" as an answer.
The question is: is the "summary in bullet points" in #28 an accurate portrayal of what you were trying to say?

Stay tuned. Tomorrow. I might have my brain back for that, and other things recuperated, that you can't know just from reading my posts, things that get in the way, despite me feeling your pain.

. And yes, sorry in advance. This is not yet a yes or no form. As I said. Kidding. Roughly 10 errors here. I will now fix. Because 3 lines I can do, right now. You won't even notice there were errors. LT zero visible mistakes. I thank @petri999 for doing the pass on my posts if I forgot to mention. It will be interesting. And is sparing me the trouble (so I can't refuse, just postpone). Really, this post here is fluff language to fix. I am not trying to figure out or scratch my brain. yes or no. tomoro. I am not kidding. about this being difficult. So, bear with me and thanks for curiosity. It is indeed on topic kind of. experement. from the sources. I fully want the answer, nor sure it will only be yes or no on all the bullets. I will use some handwaving.

@Brian-E said in #31: > Thanks but I was hoping for "yes" or "no" as an answer. > The question is: is the "summary in bullet points" in #28 an accurate portrayal of what you were trying to say? Stay tuned. Tomorrow. I might have my brain back for that, and other things recuperated, that you can't know just from reading my posts, things that get in the way, despite me feeling your pain. . And yes, sorry in advance. This is not yet a yes or no form. As I said. Kidding. Roughly 10 errors here. I will now fix. Because 3 lines I can do, right now. You won't even notice there were errors. LT zero visible mistakes. I thank @petri999 for doing the pass on my posts if I forgot to mention. It will be interesting. And is sparing me the trouble (so I can't refuse, just postpone). Really, this post here is fluff language to fix. I am not trying to figure out or scratch my brain. yes or no. tomoro. I am not kidding. about this being difficult. So, bear with me and thanks for curiosity. It is indeed on topic kind of. experement. from the sources. I fully want the answer, nor sure it will only be yes or no on all the bullets. I will use some handwaving.
#35

@InkyDarkBird said in #34:

The hell is #32 trying to say?

Isn't the #32' message write with the help of an IA ?

Just cuz the sentences are a little...strange

@InkyDarkBird said in #34: > The hell is #32 trying to say? Isn't the #32' message write with the help of an IA ? Just cuz the sentences are a little...strange
#36

Erratum (just in case the previous stuff had that readable)

I just found out that the open source (I think all of it is) Language tools (that also works native in LibreOffice or as extension, and can do stuff in other document stuff (lazy). It apparently can do what MS-editor does from the browser, but using the online rephrasing page, not the LT editor (correction page).

There one can dump the whole monster. Now testing (other stuff). FYI and sorry LT dev team for my limited report before.

Erratum (just in case the previous stuff had that readable) I just found out that the open source (I think all of it is) Language tools (that also works native in LibreOffice or as extension, and can do stuff in other document stuff (lazy). It apparently can do what MS-editor does from the browser, but using the online rephrasing page, not the LT editor (correction page). There one can dump the whole monster. Now testing (other stuff). FYI and sorry LT dev team for my limited report before.
#37

Speaking up for those who cannot speak for themselves here:

Hello Writing AI. Can you share your opinion (in style of a forum post) on wether AI written posts should be allowed in the specific forum?'.

https://pastebin.com/raw/SsYYWqDJ

Speaking up for those who cannot speak for themselves here: Hello Writing AI. Can you share your opinion (in style of a forum post) on wether AI written posts should be allowed in the specific forum?'. https://pastebin.com/raw/SsYYWqDJ
#38

What if now blog posters learn to produce bad English posts, to feel and sound more like non-native English speakers for example.

What if now blog posters learn to produce bad English posts, to feel and sound more like non-native English speakers for example.
#39

@SquareTableKnight said in #38:

What if now blog posters learn to produce bad English posts, to feel and sound more like non-native English speakers for example.
That would indeed be a terrible calamity.

@SquareTableKnight said in #38: > What if now blog posters learn to produce bad English posts, to feel and sound more like non-native English speakers for example. That would indeed be a terrible calamity.
#40

@a0cOoLbOyCoLoMbO said in #39:

That would indeed be a terrible calamity.

hmmm.. Calamity, is that not a word an AI would use? I dare you to show you true nature!

On the Enlgih native linguistico-xenophobic borderline fear, don't you find exotic music and does it not force us out of some information load slumber? from reading too well formed speech patterns. Nonetheless. And in conclusion?

@a0cOoLbOyCoLoMbO said in #39: > That would indeed be a terrible calamity. hmmm.. Calamity, is that not a word an AI would use? I dare you to show you true nature! On the Enlgih native linguistico-xenophobic borderline fear, don't you find exotic music and does it not force us out of some information load slumber? from reading too well formed speech patterns. Nonetheless. And in conclusion?

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.