@CoffeeBeanKiller said in #20:
> Mods don't remove blatantly racist, sexist and homophobic content nor the not-so-subtle nazi dogwhistles and you expect them to tackle the brainrot?
What nonsense? I haven't seen any of the things you listed here. Not even once.
@CoffeeBeanKiller said in #20:
> Mods don't remove blatantly racist, sexist and homophobic content nor the not-so-subtle nazi dogwhistles and you expect them to tackle the brainrot?
Here even communication is far too no brutal. And with very little freedom of speech. So much so that, for example, even young children (say, 11 years old) in my country interact much more harshly with each other. I'm not talking about humiliation, bullying, beatings, etc., between young children, but rather their normal interactions, arguments about various topics, and so on.
@Inventor_1 said in #21:
> What nonsense? I haven't seen any of the things you listed here. Not even once.
Ok big boy, but that you didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't there.
@CoffeeBeanKiller said in #23:
> > What nonsense? I haven't seen any of the things you listed here. Not even once.
>
> Ok big boy, but that you didn't see it doesn't mean it wasn't there.
Of course. Why did you mistakenly assume (and write this to me in response) that I think otherwise? You mistakenly assumed that. That's precisely why I used my wording, which is 100% correct. But the conclusions and simple consequences of not having seen it are as follows:
- it's definitely not widespread (even if it were, which is not a fact);
- it's more likely that it never happened than that it did;
- until such a thing is seen, it's correct to assume it didn't happen;
- in any case, if it's not widespread, it doesn't matter;
- and so on.
Incidentally, it's absolutely not a fact that it's good when it doesn't exist, and bad when it does. But that's a separate topic.
@Inventor_1 said in #24:
> Of course. Why did you mistakenly assume (and write this to me in response) that I think otherwise? You mistakenly assumed that.
Why ask a question to immediately give the answer that you assume you know?
> That's precisely why I used my wording, which is 100% correct.
And if I say "the sky is blue except when there are clouds" it's also 100% correct but it doesn't add anything of value to the discussion.
> But the conclusions and simple consequences of not having seen it are as follows:
> - it's definitely not widespread (even if it were, which is not a fact);
Wrong conclusion. Maybe you just didn't pay attention. Besides note that I never said it was widespread. I only said mods do not deal with it, for which I have plenty of evidence, and the only reason I did not share it is to avoid public shaming.
> - it's more likely that it never happened than that it did;
Wrong conclusion. It happened, since I saw it, so it is not likely that it never happened.
> - until such a thing is seen, it's correct to assume it didn't happen;
Wrong conclusion. Just because you don't see something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. If you assume it doesn't, your assumption is just wrong.
> - in any case, if it's not widespread, it doesn't matter;
Wrong conclusion. It doesn't need to be widespread to be problematic.
> - and so on.
Lol.
> Incidentally, it's absolutely not a fact that it's good when it doesn't exist, and bad when it does.
It absolutely is a fact.
@Inventor_1 said in #26:
> It's common among many in your country.
I don't want to dwell on your narcissism and the personal insults you felt compelled to use against me, but I'd just like to point out that you don't know what my country is.
@CoffeeBeanKiller said in #27:
> > It's common among many in your country.
>
> I don't want to dwell on your narcissism and the personal insults you felt compelled to use against me, but I'd just like to point out that you don't know what my country is.
Don't necessarily need to know the specific country you're from. Your words make it clear what type of country you're from. One where the nonsense you've been spouting is the real opinion of many of its people. Your politicians and television have programmed you to be so different from the people around me over the last 20 years or so that... Here, everyone would laugh at you the moment you said something like that. We have a completely different agenda, and people have completely different opinions on these topics. And the attitude towards you would be as I described above. You simply wouldn't survive among the people who live around me. And I live in the capital; the mores in the provinces of my country are much harsher, and almost everyone there treats people like you much worse. You certainly wouldn't survive there. And no insults. Just facts. A fact can't be an insult, it's just a fact.
Good job hijacking another thread, now the title could be appropriately changed to "mods please ban this Russian nationalist toxicity"
@Cedur216 said in #29:
> Good job hijacking another thread, now the title could be appropriately changed to "mods please ban this Russian nationalist toxicity"
Totally agree, one of the examples are when, Esipenko was losing in a World Cup game, I wrote that in the chat, and I got extremely attacked in the chat. And when you understand russian like me, it's even worse, trust me
@Cedur216 said in #29:
> Good job hijacking another thread, now the title could be appropriately changed to "mods please ban this Russian nationalist toxicity"
If you're alluding to me, you're completely wrong. I'm not a nationalist at all. And, for example, I absolutely do not support Putin's regime and his accomplices. And, by the way (just in case), this has nothing to do with Ukraine. I had a negative opinion of Putin and his accomplices about 20 years ago. When the majority of Ukraine's population voted for Putin's puppets. When the majority of your country's population wasn't at all against Putin and his regime. And so on. And, for example, I absolutely do not support the former regime in the USSR. I, for example, am an anti-communist. And, for example, I am against not only communism, but also everything else left-wing in politics. And unfortunately, many in the West have fallen ill with this disgusting left-wing mentality. And because of this left-wing mentality, Western society has deteriorated greatly. It has deteriorated colossally because of it. Even 30-40 years ago, smart people in Russia were saying: we need to follow the example of the West. And that's how they managed to defeat communism. But now you can't say that. In most areas, the West is still doing better than Russia. But in many areas, the situation in the West has become worse than even Russia. The Western left is rapidly destroying everything that was and still is best in the West. With each passing year, it becomes less and less possible to say: we must follow the West's example. And, for example, Putin and his accomplices exploit this perfectly in their propaganda. They show the Russian people a lot of what you now have in the West. They show what the Russian people perceive as very negative. Everything your radical left has come up with over the past 30 years is seen by the Russian people as horrific perversions. Putin tells them: look how degenerate everyone is in the West, do you want the same here? And the people's reaction is: no. Putin and his accomplices then tell them: then you can't look to the West, you have to do as we say. And the people follow Putin. For a huge number of them, the sincere argument was what Putin's propaganda showed them about how everything had become colossally worse for you than it was 30-20 years ago.