- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Win Streak

#41

@IamNOTamod said in #39

Plus, you have good ratings and a good emoji. People with ratings like these and higher and an emoji like this are very rarely stupid. ))) But saying stupid things about something happens to everyone sometimes. It happens to stupid people incredibly often, and to smart people incredibly rarely, but it happens to everyone.

@IamNOTamod said in #39 Plus, you have good ratings and a good emoji. People with ratings like these and higher and an emoji like this are very rarely stupid. ))) But saying stupid things about something happens to everyone sometimes. It happens to stupid people incredibly often, and to smart people incredibly rarely, but it happens to everyone.
#42

@IamNOTamod said in #39

I've explained everything to you in such detail already... And some of it several times... You just need to read carefully and understand. I've known these facts for over 25 years. I'm surprised I have to explain them to someone who isn't a beginner. And I haven't just explained them here, I've explained them in super-super detail. You just need to read carefully and understand. And not try to force me to explain in different words why 2 + 2 = 4 for the tenth time in a row.

@IamNOTamod said in #39 I've explained everything to you in such detail already... And some of it several times... You just need to read carefully and understand. I've known these facts for over 25 years. I'm surprised I have to explain them to someone who isn't a beginner. And I haven't just explained them here, I've explained them in super-super detail. You just need to read carefully and understand. And not try to force me to explain in different words why 2 + 2 = 4 for the tenth time in a row.
#43

It DOES appear most of the top players on the Rapid and Classical leaderboard @Inventor_1 said in #42:

@IamNOTamod said in #39

I've explained everything to you in such detail already... And some of it several times... You just need to read carefully and understand. I've known these facts for over 25 years. I'm surprised I have to explain them to someone who isn't a beginner. And I haven't just explained them here, I've explained them in super-super detail. You just need to read carefully and understand. And not try to force me to explain in different words why 2 + 2 = 4 for the tenth time in a row.
Hmmn...it DOES appear MOST of the top titled players on Lichess lose more points against lower-rated players than they gain...

To the thread OP I'm sorry for going off on such a tangent!

It DOES appear most of the top players on the Rapid and Classical leaderboard @Inventor_1 said in #42: > @IamNOTamod said in #39 > > I've explained everything to you in such detail already... And some of it several times... You just need to read carefully and understand. I've known these facts for over 25 years. I'm surprised I have to explain them to someone who isn't a beginner. And I haven't just explained them here, I've explained them in super-super detail. You just need to read carefully and understand. And not try to force me to explain in different words why 2 + 2 = 4 for the tenth time in a row. Hmmn...it DOES appear MOST of the top titled players on Lichess lose more points against lower-rated players than they gain... To the thread OP I'm sorry for going off on such a tangent!
#45

@IamNOTamod said in #43:

It DOES appear most of the top players on the Rapid and Classical leaderboard
Hmmn...it DOES appear MOST of the top titled players on Lichess lose more points against lower-rated players than they gain...

To the thread OP I'm sorry for going off on such a tangent!

When translated into my language by a translator (I don't speak English, I don't need one in everyday life, I know very little of it), your last comment turned out to be very unclear what exactly you wanted to tell me. Did I understand correctly that you finally agreed with me? Yes, of course, I'm talking about the majority of players, not all of them. Which is what I've been telling you all along. In all my comments, the wording is such that it's exactly that. And two or three times I even emphasized that I'm talking about the majority of players (not all of them). That's what I told you, that you, specifically, may be part of the minority for whom it's the opposite. It's exactly as I've been telling you all along.

@IamNOTamod said in #43: > It DOES appear most of the top players on the Rapid and Classical leaderboard > Hmmn...it DOES appear MOST of the top titled players on Lichess lose more points against lower-rated players than they gain... > > To the thread OP I'm sorry for going off on such a tangent! When translated into my language by a translator (I don't speak English, I don't need one in everyday life, I know very little of it), your last comment turned out to be very unclear what exactly you wanted to tell me. Did I understand correctly that you finally agreed with me? Yes, of course, I'm talking about the majority of players, not all of them. Which is what I've been telling you all along. In all my comments, the wording is such that it's exactly that. And two or three times I even emphasized that I'm talking about the majority of players (not all of them). That's what I told you, that you, specifically, may be part of the minority for whom it's the opposite. It's exactly as I've been telling you all along.
#46

@Inventor_1 said in #45:

When translated into my language by a translator (I don't speak English, I don't need one in everyday life, I know very little of it), your last comment turned out to be very unclear what exactly you wanted to tell me. Did I understand correctly that you finally agreed with me? Yes, of course, I'm talking about the majority of players, not all of them. Which is what I've been telling you all along. In all my comments, the wording is such that it's exactly that. And two or three times I even emphasized that I'm talking about the majority of players (not all of them). That's what I told you, that you, specifically, may be part of the minority for whom it's the opposite. It's exactly as I've been telling you all along.
The last comment was an apology to the thread creator for going off topic. And yes, I finally see things from your POV.

@Inventor_1 said in #45: > When translated into my language by a translator (I don't speak English, I don't need one in everyday life, I know very little of it), your last comment turned out to be very unclear what exactly you wanted to tell me. Did I understand correctly that you finally agreed with me? Yes, of course, I'm talking about the majority of players, not all of them. Which is what I've been telling you all along. In all my comments, the wording is such that it's exactly that. And two or three times I even emphasized that I'm talking about the majority of players (not all of them). That's what I told you, that you, specifically, may be part of the minority for whom it's the opposite. It's exactly as I've been telling you all along. The last comment was an apology to the thread creator for going off topic. And yes, I finally see things from your POV.
#47

@IamNOTamod said in #46:

The last comment was an apology to the thread creator for going off topic. And yes, I finally see things from your POV.

Well, finally. I'm glad. And it's really good that you admitted it. Well done, I approve. Most people in such cases simply disappear. And when asked, they then dodges the answer-confession. They're not good at it, they're doing it poorly. And you did the right thing by finally admitting it, I approve!

@IamNOTamod said in #46: > The last comment was an apology to the thread creator for going off topic. And yes, I finally see things from your POV. Well, finally. I'm glad. And it's really good that you admitted it. Well done, I approve. Most people in such cases simply disappear. And when asked, they then dodges the answer-confession. They're not good at it, they're doing it poorly. And you did the right thing by finally admitting it, I approve!

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.