@Wasted_Youth said in #20:
> Are he really though?
Well many ppl, including experts have that opinion. When you takes every type of Magnus achievments then there is no doubt. Espesially when he now won over Nepo in wcc. Who supposed to be the greatest, Fischer? Well he is too far away, with 1 official and 1 unofficial wwc titles, and early retirement. Kasparov? Well he was the greatest, with his long run with no 1 for many, many years.
Carlsen have so many, many impressive achievments! Many times world champion in classical, rapid, and blitz. Highest rated player ever, over 100 undeafted classical games undefeated, and so on. So when it comes to all there is no doubt that Magnus Carlsen are the greatest. He so impressive that he missing motivasjon....a reason why is wondt defend the titled anymore...because of him Chess har become a little bit boring because everyone knows he is gonna takes it all...But sometimes it looks he want some tournaments will be more exited than normal, with purpose, with example multiplie armageddon's. He is in his own liga...
Give me serious example who other else who eventually are better than Magnus truough history...please dondt mention example Tal or Fischer...that would be unserious in this context.
Oh wow. Chess players, grammar, and irony ...
Ok, maybe Carlsen are the best, I is in agreement, is you satisfied?
@Wasted_Youth said in #22:
> Oh wow. Chess players, grammar, and irony ...
> Ok, maybe Carlsen are the best, I is in agreement, is you satisfied?
It's not all about to satisfie me...or that i want him to be the greatest since im self are Norwegian, or something.
Its all about logic sence. There is no final conclusion about this, only objectiv view. If i example only counted longest timeperiod champion, then there is no doubt - Lasker would be the greatest. But simple as that he is'nt the greatest and strongest chessplayer trough history...
So it says it self, and there is no question, Magnus Carlsen are the best of them all....And maby sooner, somebody else can surpass him. But right now he are the ever best.
Magnus Carlsen is better.
I've never lost to naka or carlsen, so neither.
@adavison said in #2:
> Magnus dominates every time control except 1+0 or faster.
on a good day magnus can get a good score on hikaru in bullet. on .com magnus beat him more times in non tournament games.
Both are really though?
Well, many ppl, including experts have that opinion. When you take every type of Magnus achievements then there is no doubt. Especially when he now won over Nepo in wcc. Who supposed to be the greatest, Fischer? Well he is too far away, with 1 official and 1 unofficial wwc titles, and early retirement. Kasparov? Well, he was the greatest, with his long run with no 1 for many, many years.
Carlsen have so many, many impressive achievements! Many times, world champion in classical, rapid, and blitz. Highest rated player ever, over 100 undrafted classical games undefeated, and so on. So, when it comes to all there is no doubt that Magnus Carlsen are the greatest. He so impressive that he is missing Motivision.... a reason why won't defend the titled anymore...because of him Chess har become a little bit boring because everyone knows he is goanna takes it all...But sometimes it looks he want some tournaments will be more excited than normal, with purpose, with example multiplied Armageddon's. He is in his own liga...
Give me serious example who other else who eventually are better than Magnus truough history...please dondt mention example Tal or Fischer...that would be unserious in this context
Nakamura is the greatest of all time.
The Top Ten greatest are as follows
1. Nakamura.
2. Myself of course.
3. Carauna on steroids, but only on Steroids.
4. Major Payne
5. Fischer Bobby, but not Bobby Fischer.
6. Kramnik
7. Carlsen
8. Bobby Fischer, but not Fischer Bobby.
9. Valdmir Putin
10. Garry Kasparov
Honorable mentions: Robert J. Fisher, Donatello, Rafael, and splinter
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.