Ok.
@shadow1414 strong players don't post in forums? Because they would beg him to come to their team? WTF?? @ASEETY123 is 2700+, and he is also posting in forums, so calm down. Was it so necessary to say it? First become a strong player, then you'll know. And stop saying nonsense things, as anyway it is not allowed to beg someone to come to their team. https://lichess.org/page/chat-etiquette. It says "you are not allowed to say join my team or anything like that".
Yup! No one (jk)
I’ve played on many chess platforms over the years but between Chess.com and Lichess, I believe Lichess is better with cheat detection from when I last played on Chess.com frequently but frankly it’s been awhile since I’ve played on Chess.com. However even if Chess.com did a better job at cheat detection I’d still play here exclusively because I believe it’s a great platform and their philosophy of free and open source for everyone aligns with me quite strong, and cheaters ultimately don’t prevent me from improving my own play anyway.
-Jordan
@AnantKalia2006.
If I remember correctly, I read a post made by a master who said that they don't post because people keep bothering them about things like "join my team plz!" and it got a lot of likes, so I assume it was accurate(And it also makes sense to me).
Lots of cheaters are detected by people like you and me. One thing that facilitates detection is the tools that LiChess supplies.
Anyone can get a computer analysis of a game and look at a graph of time used.
All of the people I've reported for raising their rating using a computer on LiChess have been banned.
Using the limited tools that chess.com provides I wouldn't know how to recognize a cheater.
i have 0 clue on how either cheat detection system works. therefore it is very hard for me to make a comparison, there is also some bias (as @shadow1414 mentioned) as most players would say they think lichess has better cheat detection
Lichess is better at so many things comparing to chess.com. And the cheat detection for lichess is Top.
I have about 4k blitz games on both sites , I got 3 notifications here about rating refund and 6 times on chess.com. So yeah I think their cheat detections is about the same.
@Gadhavi_Veerbhadra I've never heard that lichess gave a second chance... But I've heard from organisers from official fide tourneys that lichess's cheat detection system was unfair and also not that powerful. From my point of view, I think that both sites have a decent cheat detection system but I have very little knowledge on the subject to say which one is better...
@StingerPuzzles chess.com also has a computer analysis and it also provides a graph. To be fair I prefer chess.com's analysis as it also shows the theoritical moves in opening as well as both brilliant and best moves as well the percentage of good moves. But that's another debate. But you can definitely catch a cheater with significant proofs on chess.com. Look at the graph, the time/move, the percentage of good moves and the progression of the player and many other factors. And then you can assume that X player may be cheating. You can never be 100% sure but you can have some decent evidences.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.