- Blind mode tutorial
lichess.org
Donate

Where can i learn the queens gambit with all of its lines?

#1

As the title says i need to learn the queens gambit declined and accepted with all of its lines, including how to defend against the albin countergambit

As the title says i need to learn the queens gambit declined and accepted with all of its lines, including how to defend against the albin countergambit
#3

Opening Explorer and adding lines to your own PGN.
I own the course mentioned above. But you always have to do some work by yourself do adjust.

Opening Explorer and adding lines to your own PGN. I own the course mentioned above. But you always have to do some work by yourself do adjust.
#6

Have you checked your local library?

Have you checked your local library?
#7

By playing over COMPLETE Games ... Start with the Capablanca vs Alekhine 1927 Match THEN Kortchnoi vs Karpov Match 1978 Then Proceed to Modern COMPLETE GAMES ... All the time looking & understanding with annotations & better suddestions from Stock . Yes go through these games HERE on Lichess Game Analysis . Shouldn't take too long either . Also look at Opening explorer & Look at the moves (I hate the idea of reddering the moves to "LINES") ... You should then look at some COMPLETE games from other Openings as well as each game has an Opening @WatchMeBeBadAtChess

By playing over COMPLETE Games ... Start with the Capablanca vs Alekhine 1927 Match THEN Kortchnoi vs Karpov Match 1978 Then Proceed to Modern COMPLETE GAMES ... All the time looking & understanding with annotations & better suddestions from Stock . Yes go through these games HERE on Lichess Game Analysis . Shouldn't take too long either . Also look at Opening explorer & Look at the moves (I hate the idea of reddering the moves to "LINES") ... You should then look at some COMPLETE games from other Openings as well as each game has an Opening @WatchMeBeBadAtChess
#8

"... [annotated games are] infinitely more useful than bare game scores. However, annotated games vary widely in quality. Some are excellent study material. Others are poor. But the most numerous fall into a third category - good-but-wrong-for-you. ... You want games with annotations that answer the questions that baffle you the most. ... masters usually don't make the kind of instructive mistakes that amateurs learn the most from. In master-vs.-master games, the errors are usually minor and the punishment is so slow coming that the educational value is often lost. ..." - GM Andrew Soltis (2010)

"... [annotated games are] infinitely more useful than bare game scores. However, annotated games vary widely in quality. Some are excellent study material. Others are poor. But the most numerous fall into a third category - good-but-wrong-for-you. ... You want games with annotations that answer the questions that baffle you the most. ... masters usually don't make the kind of instructive mistakes that amateurs learn the most from. In master-vs.-master games, the errors are usually minor and the punishment is so slow coming that the educational value is often lost. ..." - GM Andrew Soltis (2010)
#9

Fermian, N. 2009. Batsford's Modern Chess Openings. Batsfords. Fifteenth edition.

Fermian, N. 2009. Batsford's Modern Chess Openings. Batsfords. Fifteenth edition.
#10

"... For new players, I cannot recommend books that use [an encyclopedic] type of presentation [of opening theory], because the explanatory prose that elaborates typical plans and ideas is usually absent, thus leaving the student without any clear idea why certain moves are played or even preferred over other apparently equivalent moves. ... For inexperienced players, I think the model that bases opening discussions on more or less complete games that are fully annotated, though with a main focus on the opening and early middlegame, is the ideal. ..." - FM Carsten Hansen (2010)

"... For new players, I cannot recommend books that use [an encyclopedic] type of presentation [of opening theory], because the explanatory prose that elaborates typical plans and ideas is usually absent, thus leaving the student without any clear idea why certain moves are played or even preferred over other apparently equivalent moves. ... For inexperienced players, I think the model that bases opening discussions on more or less complete games that are fully annotated, though with a main focus on the opening and early middlegame, is the ideal. ..." - FM Carsten Hansen (2010)

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.